2018
DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2018.1443145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pipe failure modelling for water distribution networks using boosted decision trees

Abstract: Pipe failure modelling is an important tool for strategic rehabilitation planning of urban water distribution infrastructure. Rehabilitation predictions are mostly based on existing network data and historical failure records, both of varying quality. This paper presents a framework for the extraction and processing of such data to use it for training of decision tree-based machine learning methods. The performance of trained models for predicting pipe failures is evaluated for simple as well as more advanced,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
87
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
87
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It would be beneficial to know, for example, whether a pipe was inspected because of a functional problem (e.g., blockage) or because the condition of a network area was assessed for a possible renovation. Boosted regression trees outperformed random forest in predicting water pipe failures in Winkler et al [32]. A potential future research topic is to study, whether boosted regression trees or some other modelling method could provide better results than the logistic regression and random forest tested here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…It would be beneficial to know, for example, whether a pipe was inspected because of a functional problem (e.g., blockage) or because the condition of a network area was assessed for a possible renovation. Boosted regression trees outperformed random forest in predicting water pipe failures in Winkler et al [32]. A potential future research topic is to study, whether boosted regression trees or some other modelling method could provide better results than the logistic regression and random forest tested here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Hence, the application of statistical and ML models for pipe failure modeling constitutes an important tool for planning proactive rehabilitation strategies of WDNs. Even in limited data availability, predictive failure models can provide valuable information, helping to prioritize system rehabilitation [9].Predictive models can be classified into physical [10], statistical [11], and data-driven models [6]. In order to predict pipes' propensity to breakage, physical models analyze the load applied to the pipes and their capacity to resist it along with the corrosion that appears on the internal and external walls [10,12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the application of statistical and ML models for pipe failure modeling constitutes an important tool for planning proactive rehabilitation strategies of WDNs. Even in limited data availability, predictive failure models can provide valuable information, helping to prioritize system rehabilitation [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of these tools made it possible to classify the operating statuses of the water supply systems with an accuracy of 90%. Despite the fact that neural network, naïve Bayes classifier [31] and decision tree [23] methods are used for the detection of working conditions of water supply networks, machine learning methods, based on the empirical factor that can be considered a base for real-time monitoring in the future, have not been used. The research results may significantly contribute to diagnosing operating conditions of water supply networks and may constitute one of the tools supporting the assessment of water supply network conditions in water supply companies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lowest accuracy (78.51%) used a k-nearest neighbor algorithm. Neural networks [22] and decision trees [23] were also used to detect operation status of water supply systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%