2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.joim.2020.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pingchan granule for depressive symptoms in parkinson’s disease: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We adopted the methods of our previous trial of PCG (Gu et al, 2021). Participants were initially evaluated during a screening visit at which demographic information and eligibility criteria were verified and informed consent was also obtained.…”
Section: Recruitment and Randomizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopted the methods of our previous trial of PCG (Gu et al, 2021). Participants were initially evaluated during a screening visit at which demographic information and eligibility criteria were verified and informed consent was also obtained.…”
Section: Recruitment and Randomizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zishen Pingchan granule (ZPG) is a traditional Chinese herbal recipe, widely used to treat PD for over 30 years [9]. ZPG protects nerve cells by inhibiting the hyperactivation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase and c-Jun N-terminal kinase pathways to reduce the inflammatory reaction [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ZPG protects nerve cells by inhibiting the hyperactivation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase and c-Jun N-terminal kinase pathways to reduce the inflammatory reaction [10]. A recent randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial showed that the treatment with ZPG significantly improves the depressive symptoms of PD, with quite noticeable improvements in dyskinesia and delay in the progression of the disease [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We rated 6 studies [8,12,13,15,16,19] to be at low risk of bias as they provided adequate blinding methods. We rated 2 studies to be at high risk of performance bias as participants and personnel were not blinded to group allocation [17,18] ; 1 study [14] to be at unclear risk of performance bias as blinding of participants and personnel was not reported.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%