2021
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1988155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pilot study on the effects of a culturally-sensitive and standard pain neuroscience education for Hausa-speaking patients with chronic neck pain

Abstract: Pilot study on the effects of a culturally-sensitive and standard pain neuroscience education for Hausa-speaking patients with chronic neck pain Disability and rehabilitation -ISSN 1464-5165 -Abingdon, Taylor & francis ltd, (2021)11 p.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three, three‐arm and four, two‐arm RCTs were included. Among the former, one study compared PNE, neck/scapula stabilizer muscle strengthening and usual care (Javdaneh et al, 2021); one study compared PNE, dry needling and usual care (Valiente‐Castrillo et al, 2021) and the other compared standard PNE, culturally sensitive PNE and trunk strengthening exercises (Mukhtar et al, 2022). Among the latter, two studies compared PNE with neck and scapular stabilizer muscle strengthening (Andias et al, 2022; Matias et al, 2019), one with biomechanical education (Khosrokiani et al, 2022) and one with usual care (Andias et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three, three‐arm and four, two‐arm RCTs were included. Among the former, one study compared PNE, neck/scapula stabilizer muscle strengthening and usual care (Javdaneh et al, 2021); one study compared PNE, dry needling and usual care (Valiente‐Castrillo et al, 2021) and the other compared standard PNE, culturally sensitive PNE and trunk strengthening exercises (Mukhtar et al, 2022). Among the latter, two studies compared PNE with neck and scapular stabilizer muscle strengthening (Andias et al, 2022; Matias et al, 2019), one with biomechanical education (Khosrokiani et al, 2022) and one with usual care (Andias et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding pain intensity measurement, two studies used an NRS (Andias et al, 2022; Khosrokiani et al, 2022), four used a VAS (Andias et al, 2018; Matias et al, 2019; Mukhtar et al, 2022; Valiente‐Castrillo et al, 2021), and one used an NPAD (Javdaneh et al, 2021) as the outcome measurement for pain intensity. In terms of kinesiophobia, four of seven RCTs used the TSK as the outcome measurement for kinesiophobia (Andias et al, 2022; Khosrokiani et al, 2022; Matias et al, 2019; Valiente‐Castrillo et al, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the meaning, evaluation and interpretation of pain, and the consequent emotional and behavioral coping responses are known to be influenced by culture [79,80]. A few culturally adapted pain education materials have recently been developed and tested in adults with promising results for poor and lowliterate populations and for recent immigrants who are not acculturated yet [81][82][83][84]. However, cultural disparities also exist between children and culturally adapted pain education material for children is still non-existent today.…”
Section: Cultural Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%