Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
54
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
5
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also as many as seven alternative hypotheses that have been presented to explain the fWHR association with T (see research and discussion by Haselhuhn et al, 2013; Hehman et al, 2015; Whitehouse et al, 2015; Zebrowitz et al, 2015; Eisenbruch et al, 2017; Kramer, 2017). One hypothesis that has been under-examined thus far is that the fWHR-behavior relationships are a byproduct of the association between fWHR and other relevant traits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also as many as seven alternative hypotheses that have been presented to explain the fWHR association with T (see research and discussion by Haselhuhn et al, 2013; Hehman et al, 2015; Whitehouse et al, 2015; Zebrowitz et al, 2015; Eisenbruch et al, 2017; Kramer, 2017). One hypothesis that has been under-examined thus far is that the fWHR-behavior relationships are a byproduct of the association between fWHR and other relevant traits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, fWHR is perceived in a negative manner, as studies show that observers interpret fWHR as a signal of untrustworthiness, and down-regulate their level of cooperation accordingly (Haselhuhn, Wong, & Ormiston, 2013;Stirrat & Perrett, 2010). On the other hand, social interaction with men with higher fWHRs may also have positive aspects, as studies show that wider faced men were preferred group members during intergroup competition (Hehman, Leitner, Deegan, & Gaertner, 2015). Men with wider faces are also preferred dating partners, as are dominant men in general, albeit only for short-term relationships (Valentine, Li, Penke, & Perrett, 2014), and have higher lifetime reproductive success (Loehr & O'Hara, 2013); thus, the fWHR may be important for female mate choice.…”
Section: Interpersonal Distance Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most recently, in the context of interindividual, dyadic negotiations, men with larger FWHRs claimed more value and created less value than men with smaller FWHRs ( Haselhuhn et al, 2014 ). Perhaps due to the intimidating perceptions associated with a large FWHR, groups prefer leaders with a larger FWHR ( Hehman et al, 2015 ). Thus, it is possible that just one group member with a large FWHR can increase the value claimed during a negotiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%