2019
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-83582019370100027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phytosociological Survey of Sugarcane Crop Weeds in Different Agroecological Areas in Tucumán Province, Argentina

Abstract: Weeds constitute the main constraint on the productivity of sugarcane agroecosystems in Argentina. This work aimed to analyze the floristic and phytosociological composition of sugarcane weed communities in different agroecological areas in Tucumán. Fifteen plots from each area were sampled 60 to 90 days after crop shooting, by throwing a 0.5 m x 0.5 m quadrat metallic frame six times in random directions in each of the plots. Species found within the frame were identified. Later, fresh and dry biomass weight … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) Means followed by equal letter, lowercase in the columns and capital letters in the lines, do not differ by Tukey's test at 5% of probability. sensitive to infrequent species, whereas the Simpson's index accounts for numerous species more efficiently (Cabrera et al, 2019). The similarity index between crop systems was high in April 2010, with values higher than 0.66, regardless whether they were intercropped or single crops (Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Means followed by equal letter, lowercase in the columns and capital letters in the lines, do not differ by Tukey's test at 5% of probability. sensitive to infrequent species, whereas the Simpson's index accounts for numerous species more efficiently (Cabrera et al, 2019). The similarity index between crop systems was high in April 2010, with values higher than 0.66, regardless whether they were intercropped or single crops (Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IVI was computed using standard formula of absolute frequency, relative frequency, absolute density, relative density, absolute abundance and relative abundance. Absolute densityADgoodbreak=Total number of individuals across0.25emnormalall0.25emsampling unitsnormalSum0.25emof0.25emnormalall0.25emarea sampled Importance value index0.25em()IVIgoodbreak=Relative frequencygoodbreak+Relative densitygoodbreak+Relative abundance The IVI can range from 0 to 300. A high IVI of a specific species in a given management indicates that species is well represented because of a large number of individuals compared with other species (Cabrera et al, 2019; Mueller‐Dombois & Ellenberg, 1974). The weed diversity indices such as evenness index, richness index and ecological dominance were calculated as described by Nkoa et al (2015), Nandan et al (2018) and Nath et al (2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plants in the sample plots were collected by cutting their shoots, separated by species, placed in kraft paper bags, and dried in an oven at 70 °C for 72 hours to determine their dry biomass (CABRERA et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data collected were subjected to weed community analysis using phytosociological parameters, which show the absolute and relative values of weed frequency, density, abundance, and importance value index, through the formulas proposed by Mueller-Dombois and Ellemberg (1974) and described by Cabrera et al (2019). In addition, the coefficient of Sorensen (1972) was used to determine the similarity between the areas evaluated (properties).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%