2020
DOI: 10.3390/plants9050553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phytic Acid and Mineral Biofortification Strategies: From Plant Science to Breeding and Biotechnological Approaches

Abstract: Mineral deficiencies, particularly for iron and zinc, affect over two billion people worldwide, mainly in developing countries where diets are based on the consumption of staple crops. Mineral biofortification includes different approaches aimed to increase mineral concentration and to improve mineral bioavailability in the edible parts of plants, particularly the seeds. A multidisciplinary approach, including agronomic, genetic, physiological, and molecular expertise, is necessary to obtain detailed knowledge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations are consistent with those reported by Ariza-Nietoetal et al [ 21 ], who evaluated the mineral contents of these three grain tissues in eight bean genotypes of Andean and Mesoamerican origin. Within grains, P is stored predominantly in the form of phytic acid, which is considered one of the main anti-nutritional factors in plants, owing to its tendency to bind to other minerals and nutrients, thereby altering their digestibility and absorption by the human body [ 22 ]. Phytic acid accounts for between 65% and 85% of total P content in grains and is differentially distributed among cotyledons (95–98%), embryonic axis (1–3%), and seed coat (0.5–4%) [ 17 , 23 ], with that stored in the cotyledons and embryonic axis serving as a source of P for germination and development during the early stages of plant growth [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations are consistent with those reported by Ariza-Nietoetal et al [ 21 ], who evaluated the mineral contents of these three grain tissues in eight bean genotypes of Andean and Mesoamerican origin. Within grains, P is stored predominantly in the form of phytic acid, which is considered one of the main anti-nutritional factors in plants, owing to its tendency to bind to other minerals and nutrients, thereby altering their digestibility and absorption by the human body [ 22 ]. Phytic acid accounts for between 65% and 85% of total P content in grains and is differentially distributed among cotyledons (95–98%), embryonic axis (1–3%), and seed coat (0.5–4%) [ 17 , 23 ], with that stored in the cotyledons and embryonic axis serving as a source of P for germination and development during the early stages of plant growth [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, there are four interventions that have been adopted in curbing malnutrition and hidden hunger. These include dietary diversification, food supplementation, food fortification and biofortification (1,63).…”
Section: Interventions To Alleviate Malnutrition and Hidden Hungermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, most of the iron and zinc in the embryo and aleurone layer is bound to phytic acid, forming insoluble complexes that have poor bioavailability. Attempts to biofortify cereal grains are focussing on increasing the total amounts of iron and zinc, changing their distribution and reducing phytic acid levels (Vasconcelos et al ., 2017; Cominelli et al ., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%