2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.08.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicochemical differences between sorghum starch and sorghum flour modified by heat-moisture treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
104
5
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
20
104
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting rigid structure could restrict the swelling of starch granules. This result was consistent with previous reports, where the swelling power was reduced during HMT of rice starch [20], sweet potato starch [3] and sorghum starch [21]. Debranching treatment by pullulanase produces partially debranched amylopectin which can act like amylase and create highly crystalline structures, and thus further reduce the swelling power of EHMT starch [11].…”
Section: Swelling Power and Solubilitysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The resulting rigid structure could restrict the swelling of starch granules. This result was consistent with previous reports, where the swelling power was reduced during HMT of rice starch [20], sweet potato starch [3] and sorghum starch [21]. Debranching treatment by pullulanase produces partially debranched amylopectin which can act like amylase and create highly crystalline structures, and thus further reduce the swelling power of EHMT starch [11].…”
Section: Swelling Power and Solubilitysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Starch was isolated according to the method described by Sun et al [10] with slight modifications to the method described by Rafiq et al [7 ]. The cotyledons of Horse Chestnut seeds were chopped into small pieces and then dipped in 0.25 % sodium hydroxide solution (w/v) with the ratio of 1:3 (w/v) and kept for 12 h at 4°C.…”
Section: Isolation Of Starchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the increase of gelatinization temperature observed in moistened treated flours would be in agreement with XRD results. The rise in gelatinization temperatures has also been associated with the formation of amylose-amylose and amylose-lipid complexes within the starch granule (Lewandowicz et al 2000;Sun et al 2014). Lewandowicz et al (2000) also suggested that higher gelatinization temperature of microwaved starches may indicate an association and a more stable configuration in a granular structure.…”
Section: Differential Scanning Calorimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, relatively little work has been reported on flour changes during microwave irradiation, solely on wheat (Ashraf et al 2012). Sun et al (2014) applied heat moisture treatment to sorghum starch and flour, demonstrating physicochemical differences between both. The treatment had a far greater effect on solubility, swelling power, setback viscosity, enthalpy of gelatinization and crystallinity of flour than that of starch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%