2013
DOI: 10.1080/19476337.2012.722565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicochemical characterization of chitosan derivatives

Abstract: The present work analyses different chitosan synthesized derivatives from the point of view of their chemical structure (Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, deacetylation degree, elemental analysis and average molecular weight) as well as different physicochemical properties such as density, kinematic and dynamic viscosity, intrinsic viscosity and surface tension. The characterization of different solutions of these solutes has a high importance due to the large potential uses of these compounds. Chitosan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result was in cope with the previously reported works on CHN analysis of chitosan. 30 The ATR spectra of commercial chitosan and isolated chitosan are shown in Figure 1. Nine major peaks were obtained for chitosan prepared from shrimp shell and were almost similar as that of commercial chitosan.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result was in cope with the previously reported works on CHN analysis of chitosan. 30 The ATR spectra of commercial chitosan and isolated chitosan are shown in Figure 1. Nine major peaks were obtained for chitosan prepared from shrimp shell and were almost similar as that of commercial chitosan.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The viscosity average molecular weight ( M v ) of sulfate and phosphate functionalized derivatives and native chitosan was estimated based on the Mark–Houwink equation. Mark–Houwink constants, K and a , were considered to be 8.2 × 10 –4 and 0.72, respectively, for CH in a 0.3 M AcOH–0.2 M NaOAc solvent system, 1.75 × 10 –5 and 0.93, respectively, for CS in a 0.1 M NaCl solvent system, whereas they were 1.81 × 10 –5 and 0.98, respectively, for CP in 0.1 M AcOH–0.2 M NaCl …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two transition points, corresponding to excess HCl (x) and protonated chitosan (y) were taken from the titration curve. [26,27] The difference in the amount of NaOH consumed is equivalent to the amount of free deacetylated amino groups and it is given by equation (2).…”
Section: Estimation Of Degree Of Deacetylation (Ds Da )mentioning
confidence: 99%