1993
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-90161993000100016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicochemical characteristics and fatty acid composition of tomato seed oils from processing wastes

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The major component of tomato processing industry wastes is seed. Samples of tomato (Petomech var.) pomace from industries of São Paulo state submitted to Hot and Cold Break treatments, were spontaneously fermented and washed to separate seeds. The oils were analysed for specific gravity, iodine and saponifícation numbers, refractive index, viscosity and fatty acid composition. Except for saponifícation number, Hot and Cold Break seed oils were very similar. In both treatments palmitic acid was the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
17
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
7
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the ether extract values, the variation was from 9.96 (September) to 11.68% (June), with a mean value of 10.83% for guava waste, and from 5.73 (October) to 11.17% (August) for tomato waste, with a mean value of 8.45%. The values were similar to the ones obtained by Santos et al (2009), 11.20%, andSilva (1999), 11.30%, for guava waste, inferior to the ones mentioned for tomato waste by Cantarelli et al (1993) and Mccay & Smith (1940), of 14.6 to 29.65%, and close to the ones obtained by Kavamoto et al (1971) and Kronka et al (1971), of 2.11% and 11.56%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For the ether extract values, the variation was from 9.96 (September) to 11.68% (June), with a mean value of 10.83% for guava waste, and from 5.73 (October) to 11.17% (August) for tomato waste, with a mean value of 8.45%. The values were similar to the ones obtained by Santos et al (2009), 11.20%, andSilva (1999), 11.30%, for guava waste, inferior to the ones mentioned for tomato waste by Cantarelli et al (1993) and Mccay & Smith (1940), of 14.6 to 29.65%, and close to the ones obtained by Kavamoto et al (1971) and Kronka et al (1971), of 2.11% and 11.56%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These values are similar to the ones obtained by Santos et al (2009) for guava waste, 10.90%, and to the ones obtained by Silva (1999), 8.60%, and they are inferior to the values obtained by Mccay & Smith (1940) and Cantarelli et al (1993) for tomato waste, from 22.9% to 36.8%. For the ether extract values, the variation was from 9.96 (September) to 11.68% (June), with a mean value of 10.83% for guava waste, and from 5.73 (October) to 11.17% (August) for tomato waste, with a mean value of 8.45%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations