2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2015.12.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physico-chemical characterization of biochars from solid municipal waste for use in soil amendment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
43
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
8
43
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…4 (b)), but varied very widely among the feedstocks. The increase in pH was due mainly to the release of some basic elements as the pyrolysis temperature increased (Rehrah et al 2016). Therefore, the pH and EC of biochar are correlated for all feedstocks (r = 0.7) (Fig.…”
Section: Biochar Yields and Compositionsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…4 (b)), but varied very widely among the feedstocks. The increase in pH was due mainly to the release of some basic elements as the pyrolysis temperature increased (Rehrah et al 2016). Therefore, the pH and EC of biochar are correlated for all feedstocks (r = 0.7) (Fig.…”
Section: Biochar Yields and Compositionsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…24 Besides, fixed carbon content increased from 33.70% (300 ∘ C) to 57.91% (600 ∘ C), and then stabilized at 58% in the pyrolysis temperature range 700 to 800 ∘ C. Calisto et al 24 found that the release of VM as well as the increase of non-volatile carbon were the two main factors responsible for carbon-rich and highly porous biochar formation, therefore a lower ratio of VM to fixed carbon was more beneficial for NH 4 + adsorption. The pH of BRC samples increased with temperature increase due to the carbonization of BR which resulted in separation of the minerals from the organic matrix, and subsequently enhanced content of alkali elements 21,30 (especially Mg 2+ and Ca 2+ ), which was further confirmed by the result of EDX analysis (Fig. 2) as well as the higher ash content under higher pyrolysis temperature (Table 1).…”
Section: Proximate Analysis and Elemental Compositionsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The temperature significantly affected PY, which decreased with increasing temperature due to decomposition of the components of BR. The decrease was first sharp as the temperature was increased from 300 (76.39%) to 600 ∘ C (44.71%), then the decrease became steady as the temperature was increased from 700 to 800 ∘ C. This decrease was attributed to the dehydration of hydroxyl groups, the loss of chemically bound moisture as well as the thermal degradation of lignocellulosic structures, 21,29 which was consistent with the TG analysis showing that the main mass loss occurred in the range 250 to 700 ∘ C.…”
Section: Characterizations Of Br/brc Samples Tg-dtg Analysis Of Br Samentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to these SEM images, the char morphology changed with the pyrolysis peak temperature [19]. Overall, it was observed that the porosity increased as the pyrolysis temperature increased due to the release of volatiles compounds during thermochemical degradation [20,21]. The higher the pyrolysis temperature, the lower the pore sizes of the char [19].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The pore network observed for chars suggest their potential use as soil amendment. The porosity can play an important role for helping as a storage of water in soil, serving as habitat for a variety of 5 E3S Web of Conferences 22, 00043 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20172200043 ASEE17 microorganism, and help in the root movement in soils [20]. On the other hand, these chars could be also be used depending on the pore size as gas adsorbent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%