1999
DOI: 10.1029/1999gl900244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical‐statistical retrieval of water vapor profiles using SSM/T‐2 Sounder data

Abstract: Abstract. The feasibility of retrieving water vapor profiles from downlooking passive microwave sounder data is demonstrated by usage of a retrieval algorithm which extends Bayesian optimal estimation. Special Sensor Microwave T-2 (SSM/T-2) downlooking sounder data, consisting of brightness temperature measurements sensitive to water vapor, are used together with total water vapor content data for computing tropospheric water vapor profiles. The significant nonlinearity in the cost function, an implication of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of training dataset is thus essential since it holds all the physics of the problem. Iterative schemes adjust the estimated relative humidity profile using successive perturbations on an a priori state of the atmosphere (selected, for example, using a Bayesian approach; Rieder and Kirchengast, 1999; Rosenkranz, 2001) and the physical constraint comes from radiative transfer computations, the best profile minimizing a cost function (e.g. Wilheit and Al‐Khalaf, 1994).…”
Section: Information Content Of the 18331 Ghz Bandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of training dataset is thus essential since it holds all the physics of the problem. Iterative schemes adjust the estimated relative humidity profile using successive perturbations on an a priori state of the atmosphere (selected, for example, using a Bayesian approach; Rieder and Kirchengast, 1999; Rosenkranz, 2001) and the physical constraint comes from radiative transfer computations, the best profile minimizing a cost function (e.g. Wilheit and Al‐Khalaf, 1994).…”
Section: Information Content Of the 18331 Ghz Bandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22] Dependent on the quality of the a priori profile, the first or the first two iteration steps may need special aid with convergence due to linearization errors, which is often dealt with in extending the Gauss-Newton scheme to the Levenberg-Marquardt scheme [e.g., Rodgers, 2000;Rieder and Kirchengast, 1999]. We utilized the more simple but for the present purpose equivalently effective extension introduced by Liu et al [2000], termed ''D-rad'' method.…”
Section: Retrieval Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, the use of a retrieval technique (e.g., neural network or 1-D-variational) using prior physical information should further improve the estimation: for instance, the surface layer should clearly benefit from prior knowledge of the surface temperature and total water vapor content. In fact, a comparison with existing works based on methods combining physical constraints with statistical tools (Kuo et al, 1994;Cabrera-Mercadier and Staelin, 1995;Rieder and Kirchengast, 1999;Liu and Weng, 2005;Aires et al, 2013) applied to on similar radiometers with less channels in the 183.31 GHz line, such as AMSU-B or MHS, shows that the current approach gives similar performance (root mean square errors of about 10 %RH in the mid-troposphere). It is also consistent with the layer-averaged RH profiles estimated by the Indian team involved in the Megha-Tropiques mission, although further constraining the retrieval by NCEP/NCAR outputs (Venkat Ratnam et al, 2013;Gohil et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, most of the approaches are physically based iterative techniques such as a n-dimensional variational algorithm that converges to the least biased profile using other inputs as prior knowledge of the system under study (such as surface emissivity, temperature profile and sometimes a prior water vapor profile for BT simulations). These variational techniques are well established (Kuo et al, 1994;Cabrera-Mercadier and Staelin, 1995;Rieder and Kirchengast, 1999;Blankenship et al, 2000;Liu and Weng, 2005) and it would be unnecessary to reinvent a similar algorithm. Here, the selected approach is to learn the relationship between the inputs (i.e., the BTs) and the output (i.e., the averaged RH in a specific atmospheric layer) directly from a training set that implicitly contains all the relevant information such as the statistical distribution of the atmospheric RH or the radiative transfer equation from the set of BTs.…”
Section: R G Sivira Et Al: Relative Humidity Profiling With Megha-mentioning
confidence: 99%