Physical Models and Physiological Concepts: Explanation in Nineteenth-Century Biology

Abstract

SynopsisThe response to physics and chemistry which characterized mid-nineteenth century physiology took two major directions. One, found most prominently among the German physiologists, developed explanatory models which had as their fundamental assumption the ultimate reducibility of all biological phenomena to the laws of physics and chemistry. The other, characteristic of the French school of physiology, recognized that physics and chemistry provided potent analytical tools for the exploration of physiological activities, but assumed in the construction of explanatory models that the organism involved special levels of organization and that there must, in consequence, be special biological laws.The roots of this argument about concept formation in physiology are explored in the works of Theodor Schwann, Johannes Müller, François Magendie and Claude Bernard among others.

Vitalism in contemporary chiropractic: a help or a hinderance?

“…Researchers agreed on many characteristics of the something however, they could not agree on the explanation for it. Consequently it is a mistake to presume that all vitalists are the same [39].…”

The Early Modern Kidney—Nephrology in and about the Nineteenth Century (Part 2)

“…Essentially, in addition to being the most concrete of the basic medical sciences, chemistry was also a service science of broad ramifications that fueled most of the industrial, agricultural, and economic advances of the nineteenth century . Independent of these considerations, by mid‐century, medical chemistry had become indispensable to the study of function .…”

“…In the intellectual and technical developments that followed in the 19th century, the world began to change at a pace never achieved before in history. Nowhere was the impact of this systematic investigative enterprise on the accrual of new knowledge as evident as it was in the basic medical sciences, which flourished and transformed medicine into the scientific discipline that it is today . In the cumulative and progressive nature of scientific knowledge in general and that of medical knowledge in particular, two distinct and separate avenues of inquiry were instrumental in the evolution of understanding bodily functions in general and the function of the kidney in particular .…”

The Early Modern Kidney—Nephrology in and about the Nineteenth Century (Part 1)

“…Chemistry entered the basic sciences as chemical physiology and studied mostly in physiology departments. The early chemical studies began by Antoine Lavoisier (1743–1794) and Antoine Fourcroy (1755–1809) in France, Carl Scheele (1742–1786) and Jöns Berzelius (1779–1848) in Sweden, and Humphry Davy (1778–1829) in England were relatively slower to mature into the organic chemistry of mid‐century nurtured by physiologists that gradually evolved into the physical chemistry of the closing decades of the century, a subject to be covered in the second part of this article (17,18). Ultimately, it was physical chemistry that would provide the gadgetry (ions, diffusion, dialysis, electrolytes, osmolality) that was instrumental in the emergence of nephrology in the second half of the 20th century.…”