2021
DOI: 10.18287/jbpe21.07.040202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phthalocyanines Structure Versus Photodynamic Effectiveness towards Pathogenic Microorganisms: Our Recent Experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The full photodynamic inactivation result (~log 6) was determined for 5 μM of ZnPcMe but with low efficiency (<log 3) at lower concentrations. These observations confirm the previous studies with ZnPcMe, with photoinactivation capacity at lower concentrations [ 26 ]. Considering the structures of both peripherally substituted complexes, the phototoxic effect of ZnPcMe was higher than that of pPdPc ( Figure 2 and Figure 4 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The full photodynamic inactivation result (~log 6) was determined for 5 μM of ZnPcMe but with low efficiency (<log 3) at lower concentrations. These observations confirm the previous studies with ZnPcMe, with photoinactivation capacity at lower concentrations [ 26 ]. Considering the structures of both peripherally substituted complexes, the phototoxic effect of ZnPcMe was higher than that of pPdPc ( Figure 2 and Figure 4 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The full phototoxic effect was observed with complex ZnPcMe, which is known as a highly effective photosensitizer in the photodynamic inactivation of pathogenic species, including viruses [ 24 , 25 ]. The results with A. hydrophila support the role of zinc as a proper metal ion for PDT photosensitizers [ 26 , 28 ]. Lately, it was reported that cationic photosensitizers have a high impact on the antimicrobial efficiency because of the binding ability and the charge density distribution of cationic groups [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation