2020
DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.9b01093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoswitchable gRNAs for Spatiotemporally Controlled CRISPR-Cas-Based Genomic Regulation

Abstract: The recently discovered CRISPR-Cas gene editing system and its derivatives have found numerous applications in fundamental biology research and pharmaceutical sciences. The need for precise external control over the gene editing and regulatory events has driven the development of inducible CRISPR-Cas systems. While most of the light-controllable CRISPR-Cas systems are based on protein engineering, we developed an alternative synthetic approach based on modification of crRNA/ tracrRNA duplex (guide RNA or gRNA)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
76
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chemical modications have enriched the versatility of conditional control of RNA-based technology, such as siRNA for silencing of mRNA [52][53][54] and gRNA for CRISPR function. [36][37][38][39][40][41][42] However, previously reported RNA caging strategies were generally based on structural variation of nucleic acids through disrupting base pairing or signicant alteration of molecular identities, but they neglected the interactive impacts between RNA and RNA binding proteins. Our current study indicates that interruption of the interactive sites between 2 0 -OH of ribose in the seed region of gRNA and the Cas9 protein would significantly disturb the Cas9 activity, and these sites can be utilized to introduce photolabile groups for optical control of CRISPR function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Chemical modications have enriched the versatility of conditional control of RNA-based technology, such as siRNA for silencing of mRNA [52][53][54] and gRNA for CRISPR function. [36][37][38][39][40][41][42] However, previously reported RNA caging strategies were generally based on structural variation of nucleic acids through disrupting base pairing or signicant alteration of molecular identities, but they neglected the interactive impacts between RNA and RNA binding proteins. Our current study indicates that interruption of the interactive sites between 2 0 -OH of ribose in the seed region of gRNA and the Cas9 protein would significantly disturb the Cas9 activity, and these sites can be utilized to introduce photolabile groups for optical control of CRISPR function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent reports have shed some new light on this approach. These studies include utilization of photocleavable antisense DNA to regulate the activity of gRNA, 36 photoactivation of directly caged gRNA, [37][38][39][40] and ligand-induced deprotection of gRNA. 41,42 The general principle for these designs relies on signicant structural alteration of gRNA either by blocking the base pairing [36][37][38][39] or by changing the overall chemical identity through unspecic multiple modications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These numbers are in accordance with previous mathematical This strategy resulted in improved editing efficiencies. This strategy could be further optimized and de-risked for clinical application by developing inducible Pol III promoters which restrict HIV-1 gRNAs expression to HIV-1-infected cells [44][45][46][47] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, photocleavage of NPOM-modified DNA/RNA has been used to control the activities of DNAzymes 29 , antisense DNA/RNA 13,30 , restriction endonucleases 31 , DNA-binding transcription factors 32 , polymerase chain reaction (PCR) rates 33 , as well as CRISPR-Cas gene editing 9,18,[34][35] . In these cases, NPOM-modifications prevent the DNA or RNA from hybridizing to the complementary strands, which could be reversed upon NPOM cleavage with light, converting the unhybridized 'inactive' molecules to hybridized 'active' molecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%