“…The systematically higher values of our extinction estimates may be due to internal extinction within the cluster. Our distance estimates based on the (r−i, r), (Hα index, r), and (Hα index, Wri) diagrams agree well with each other: They also agree well with earlier published values except for the NGC6834 cluster for which we obtain a significantly greater distance (3115 ± 63, 3115 ± 120, and 2950 ± 59 based on (r − i, r), (Hα index, r), and (Hα index, Wri) diagrams, respectively) than inferred by Paunzen and Netopil (2006) where D(P ublished) are published distance estimates adopted from Paunzen and Netopil (2006); Meynet et al (1993); Phelps and Janes (1994); Lata et al (2014); Keller et al (2005) and D(r − i, i), D(r, Hα index), and D(Wri, Hα index) are our distance estimates based on the (r − i, i), (r, Hα index), and D(Wri, Hα index) diagrams, respectively (see Table 3).…”