2006
DOI: 10.1080/00268970600611017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoionization of TMPD in DMSO solution: mechanism and magnetic field effects

Abstract: Photoionization of N,N,N 0 ,N 0 -tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine (TMPD) in alcoholic solution produces the radical ion pair [TMPD .þ e À ]. However, the identity of the negatively charged counter-radical formed by photolysis of TMPD in DMSO (dimethylsulphoxide)/toluene mixtures, for which unusually large effects of weak applied magnetic fields have been observed, is unclear. Modulated MARY (Magnetically Affected Reaction Yield) experiments on solutions containing different isotopomers of TMPD, DMSO and toluene … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With these parameters, the low field effect in the exact QM calculation is seen to be quite pronounced, but not unreasonable: low field effects of this magnitude have certainly been observed experimentally. 34 As one would expect on the basis of the electron spin correlation tensors in Figs. 2 and 3, the present SC theory does a remarkably good job of capturing the correct low field effect, even in a radical pair with as few as 12 nuclear spins.…”
Section: The Low Field Effectmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With these parameters, the low field effect in the exact QM calculation is seen to be quite pronounced, but not unreasonable: low field effects of this magnitude have certainly been observed experimentally. 34 As one would expect on the basis of the electron spin correlation tensors in Figs. 2 and 3, the present SC theory does a remarkably good job of capturing the correct low field effect, even in a radical pair with as few as 12 nuclear spins.…”
Section: The Low Field Effectmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…( 12) for a radical pair with no nuclear spins in one radical and 12 I = 1/2 nuclear spins in the other, as a function of the magnetic field strength B and the recombination rate constant k. The reason for taking one of the radicals in the pair to have no hyperfine interactions and the other to have many is that this has been established experimentally to be the situation in which the low field effect is most pronounced. 34,35 The reason for stopping at 12 I = 1/2 nuclear spins in the large radical is simply one of convenience: these calculations have to be done for a range of magnetic field strengths and for sufficiently long times to ensure the convergence of the integral in Eq. ( 12), and so are computationally more demanding than any of the calculations we have reported so far.…”
Section: The Low Field Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although cryptochrome seems to be required for a number of magnetic responses in fruit flies [59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68] , there is no definite proof yet that cryptochrome functions as the magnetic sensor or that the Drosophila findings have a direct bearing on the mechanism of compass magnetoreception in birds. Moreover, it is not clear whether the magnetic field effects observed for purified cryptochromes in vitro 23,39,69 , or the reaction scheme that accounts for them, are identical to those in vivo 2 . It is therefore appropriate to explore alternative photocycles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as the field-dependent detection of reaction products is concerned, one may restrict oneself to the final yield ϕ­( B ) = c (∞, B ). The term MARY (magnetically-affected reaction yields) spectra has become customary for the diagrams of such functions ϕ­( B ). In a more general way, the functions c ( t , B ), when plotted against the field B for fixed values of time are denoted as time-resolved MARY spectra …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%