2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32523-7_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photofeeler-D3: A Neural Network with Voter Modeling for Dating Photo Impression Prediction

Abstract: In just a few years, online dating has become the dominant way that young people meet to date, making the deceptively error-prone task of picking good dating profile photos vital to a generation's ability to form romantic connections. Until now, artificial intelligence approaches to Dating Photo Impression Prediction (DPIP) have been very inaccurate, unadaptable to real-world application, and have only taken into account a subject's physical attractiveness. To that effect, we propose Photofeeler-D3 -the first … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, an ML model may be trained to predict privacy-sensitive information such as sexual orientation and/or political affiliation using social network profiles [11,21,27]. Recent work has shown similar intrusive usages of ML models, predicting attractiveness using profile pictures [9,13], and reporting life satisfaction [1,22]. Although some of these usages seem innocuous, the deployment of such ML models may be seen as a threat to individual privacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, an ML model may be trained to predict privacy-sensitive information such as sexual orientation and/or political affiliation using social network profiles [11,21,27]. Recent work has shown similar intrusive usages of ML models, predicting attractiveness using profile pictures [9,13], and reporting life satisfaction [1,22]. Although some of these usages seem innocuous, the deployment of such ML models may be seen as a threat to individual privacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%