(Photo)electrochemical Methods for the Determination of the Band Edge Positions of TiO₂‐Based Nanomaterials

Abstract

TiO 2 -based nanomaterials play currently a major role in the development of novel photochemical systems and devices. One of the key parameters determining the photoactivity of TiO 2 -based materials is the position of the band edges. Although its knowledge is an important prerequisite for understanding and optimizing the performance of photochemical systems, it has been often rather neglected in recent research, particularly in the field of heterogeneous photocatalysis. This paper provides a concise account of main methods for the determination of the position of the band edges, particularly those suitable for measurements on nanostructured materials. In the first part, a survey of key photophysical and photochemical concepts necessary for understanding the energetics at the semiconductor/solution interface is provided. This is followed by a detailed discussion of several electrochemical, photoelectrochemical, and spectroelectrochemical methods that can be applied for the determination of band edge positions in compact and nanocrystalline thin films, as well as in nanocrystalline powders.

Enabling visible-light water photooxidation by coordinative incorporation of Co(II/III) cocatalytic sites into organic-inorganic hybrids: quantum chemical modeling and photoelectrochemical performance

“…To modify the surface of TiO 2 with polyheptazine, the electrodes were placed in a Schlenk tube connected via an adapter with a flask containing 1 g of urea and heated in a muffle oven at 425°C for 30 min. 15 N-labeled urea (98%, Euriso-Top) has been used in the synthesis of samples for solid-state NMR.…”

“…One possible strategy to overcome this problem is the use of alternative photochemical architectures in which the light-harvesting absorber (for example a dye) is able to inject electrons into a nanocrystalline layer of a wide-bandgap oxide with a relatively negative potential of the conduction band edge (e.g. for anatase TiO 2 at −0.15 V versus RHE [14,15]). At the same time, the light absorber must be coupled to an oxygen evolution cocatalyst (e.g.…”

Water splitting and the band edge positions of TiO2

“…E FB is the potential at which the energy barrier of the depletion layer disappears, and if we neglect experimental perturbations (like potential drop across the Helmholtz-layer and specifically adsorbed ions), it corresponds to the electron Fermi level with respect to vacuum, ÀE F [6]. The E FB is usually obtained from Mott-Schottky plots from electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, as well as by some other electrochemical and spectro-electrochemical techniques [7][8][9]. The spectro/photo/ electrochemical measurements by Jankulovska et al [8] confirmed the positive offset of 0.2 eV between the CBMs of anatase and rutile, and other measurements, like EPR [10], photoluminescence [11], photocatalytic Ag + reduction [12,13] and H 2 evolution [14] on mixed-phase particles, also reported the CBM of anatase being higher than that of rutile.…”

Highly photoactive Brookite and Anatase with enhanced photocatalytic activity for the degradation of indigo carmine application

“…By accessing the Eg value and assuming that Efb and the conduction band (Ecb) practically merges at the Eonset[43], then we can schematize an energy diagram for the two phases and position the Ecb and valence band (Evb)…”