2011
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/22/6/065701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phosphorus δ-doped silicon: mixed-atom pseudopotentials and dopant disorder effects

Abstract: Within a full density functional theory framework we calculate the band structure and doping potential for phosphorus δ-doped silicon. We compare two different representations of the dopant plane; pseudo-atoms in which the nuclear charge is fractional between silicon and phosphorus, and explicit arrangements employing distinct silicon and phosphorus atoms. While the pseudo-atom approach offers several computational advantages, the explicit model calculations differ in a number of key points, including the vall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
91
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
9
91
2
Order By: Relevance
“…we calculate VS L ′ as the average difference between the two 1L From this we derive an L ′ valley splitting of 193 meV, which is almost twice the value obtained using the mixedatom approach. As noted previously in the context of Si:P δ-doping 17,18 the mixed-atom approach, for all its intuitive utility, tends to underestimate valley splittings. Figure 5(c) shows the band structure for the same 1/4 ML explicit-ordered dopant pattern, except that phosphorus is now used as the dopant.…”
Section: Explicit-dopants: Orderedmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…we calculate VS L ′ as the average difference between the two 1L From this we derive an L ′ valley splitting of 193 meV, which is almost twice the value obtained using the mixedatom approach. As noted previously in the context of Si:P δ-doping 17,18 the mixed-atom approach, for all its intuitive utility, tends to underestimate valley splittings. Figure 5(c) shows the band structure for the same 1/4 ML explicit-ordered dopant pattern, except that phosphorus is now used as the dopant.…”
Section: Explicit-dopants: Orderedmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Density functional theory (DFT) calculations on δ-doped germanium are conducted by adapting the general approach previously applied to Si:P by ourselves [16][17][18] and others [19][20][21] to the specific requirements of Ge:P and Ge:As. All calculations are performed using the SIESTA software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tight-binding calculations have also been performed [26][27][28], including a calculation of the quadratic Stark coefficient of the hyperfine interaction which has reproduced experimentally measured values more accurately than effective mass theory [29]. Two-dimensional layers of dopants in silicon known as δ-layers have been described using density functional theory with compact atomic-orbital basis sets [30,31], and additional DFT studies [16,32] evaluated the use of mixed pseudopotentials, which treat the dopant and silicon atoms in the layer using the same core potential, and compared them to all-atom calculations. These DFT calculations and a number of additional calculations (see Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some of this disagreement can be attributed to geometrical effects of dopant placement which we will not explore in detail (see instead Refs. [33] and [16]), the accuracy of the description of dopant electronic structure contributes to these discrepancies. Additionally, electrically detected magnetic resonance (EDMR) [34] has called into question a theoretical picture of the scattering of electrons in a two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) from dopants in silicon [35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%