2022
DOI: 10.1080/16583655.2022.2147387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic and molecular detection of biofilm formation in clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from Malaysia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, no correlation was found between slime and biofilm production among staphylococcal isolates investigated in this study (Table 2 ). Similar observations have been reported for S. aureus human and animal isolates in earlier investigations [ 21 , 37 ]. The lack of correlation between slime and biofilm production in S. aureus may be attributed to different measurement methods, i.e., Congo red agar method versus microtiter plate-based crystal violet assay, leading to disparities in the results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, no correlation was found between slime and biofilm production among staphylococcal isolates investigated in this study (Table 2 ). Similar observations have been reported for S. aureus human and animal isolates in earlier investigations [ 21 , 37 ]. The lack of correlation between slime and biofilm production in S. aureus may be attributed to different measurement methods, i.e., Congo red agar method versus microtiter plate-based crystal violet assay, leading to disparities in the results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The presence of agrI has been significantly associated with biofilm production amongst MSSA isolates in this study (Table 3 ), corresponding well with another study using nonclinical isolates [ 42 ]. Kawamura et al [ 44 ] found that MRSA isolates haboring agrII have a significantly greater ability to produce biofilm, however; Usun Jones et al [ 21 ] and Cha et al [ 45 ] found no variation in MRSA biofilm production among different agr groups. The difference might be attributed to variations between strains, potentially resulting from microbial adaptation and geographical influences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DNA amplification of spa locus, agr groups, 15 MSCRAMM-associated genes ( bap , bbp , clfA , clfB , cna , eno , ebps , fib , fnbA , fnbB , icaAD , icaBC , pls , sasC , and sasG ) and 19 virulence genes including staphylococcal enterotoxin genes ( sea , seb , sec , seg , seh , sei , sel , sem , sen , seo , and ser ), toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 gene ( tst ), exfoliative toxin gene ( eta ), leukocidin genes ( lukED and lukPV ), and hemolysin genes ( hla , hlb , hld , and hlg ) was performed using primers and conditions as described in previous published studies [ 27 , 28 , 29 ]. The isolates were also screened for their SCC mec type by PCR amplification with standard protocols [ 30 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, standard blood cultures often fail to identify biofilm-embedded pathogens for multiple reasons, and no standardized protocols are in place for their detection [ 52 , 53 ]. Given that the virulence factors of biofilm-forming species have been well characterized [ 54 ], specialized diagnostic approaches—such as molecular techniques—have emerged as promising alternatives for achieving accurate and timely pathogen identification [ 55 , 56 , 57 ].…”
Section: Ds Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%