2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2008.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenolic ripeness assessment of grape skin by texture analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
63
1
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(15 reference statements)
1
63
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Berry skin thickness, together with skin break force, is an important technological parameter for red grapes, as it is related to the extractability of phenolic substances from the skin . Skin break force and thickness are directly related to the cell permeability index (EA%) (Río Segade et al, 2008), from which information on the ease of transfer of these compounds can be gained. Briefly, the higher the EA% values, the slower and less the dissolution of anthocyanins in the must during maceration (Cagnasso et al, 2008).…”
Section: Gflv and Gfkv Mixed Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berry skin thickness, together with skin break force, is an important technological parameter for red grapes, as it is related to the extractability of phenolic substances from the skin . Skin break force and thickness are directly related to the cell permeability index (EA%) (Río Segade et al, 2008), from which information on the ease of transfer of these compounds can be gained. Briefly, the higher the EA% values, the slower and less the dissolution of anthocyanins in the must during maceration (Cagnasso et al, 2008).…”
Section: Gflv and Gfkv Mixed Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berry skin break force and energy represent meaningful mechanical properties for varietal characterization and differentiation. These skin texture parameters allowed the differentiation of 13 red winegrape varieties from Galicia (northwest Spain) (Río Segade et al 2008), and they are also little influenced by grape ripening stage , Zouid et al 2011. Instead, berry skin thickness could not be considered a good differentiating attribute because it agreed for all the Galician red cultivars studied (Río Segade et al 2008.…”
Section: Instrumental Texture Parameters As Varietal Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These skin texture parameters allowed the differentiation of 13 red winegrape varieties from Galicia (northwest Spain) (Río Segade et al 2008), and they are also little influenced by grape ripening stage , Zouid et al 2011. Instead, berry skin thickness could not be considered a good differentiating attribute because it agreed for all the Galician red cultivars studied (Río Segade et al 2008. In red winegrape varieties cultivated in Italy, such as Barbera, Brachetto, Cabernet Sauvignon, Dolcetto, Freisa, Nebbiolo, and Pinot noir, both hardness and thickness of berry skins differed significantly (Letaief et al 2008a).…”
Section: Instrumental Texture Parameters As Varietal Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations