“…Schmitz‐Dumont & Reckhard conducted liquidus measurements for the Cs 2 Ti 2 O 5 –TiO 2 system, reporting the formation of one intermediate stoichiometric compound, Cs 2 Ti 4 O 9 . Grey et al, however, did not observe the formation of Cs 2 Ti 4 O 9 but instead identified the compounds Cs 2 Ti 5 O 11 and Cs 2 Ti 6 O 13 , which were subsequently confirmed by Grey et al, Kwiatkowska et al, Bursill et al, Peres et al, and Kobyakov et al Thus, the Cs 2 Ti 4 O 9 compound, and by extension the liquidus data reported by Schmitz‐Dumont & Reckhard, was neglected while Cs 2 Ti 5 O 11 and Cs 2 Ti 6 O 13 were included in the assessment of the Cs 2 O–TiO 2 system. Grey et al were unable to experimentally determine the liquidus boundary in the analyzed 75‐100 mol% TiO 2 region of the Cs 2 O–TiO 2 system due to Cs volatilization, although phase transition temperatures were reported as follows: Cs 2 Ti 2 O 5 + Cs 2 Ti 5 O 11 → Cs 2 Ti 5 O 11 + melt = 1117 K, Cs 2 Ti 5 O 11 + melt → Cs 2 Ti 6 O 13 + melt = 1373 K, and Cs 2 Ti 6 O 13 + melt → TiO 2 + melt = 1405 K. Lu & Jin summarized TiO 2 melting temperatures measured in varied atmospheres, ultimately adopting the 2185 ± 10 K melting point measured for a near stoichiometric TiO 1.999 sample in a pure oxygen atmosphere.…”