2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.08.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase I Trial of Stereotactic MRI-Guided Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy (SMART) for the Treatment of Oligometastatic Ovarian Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Henke et al also published results of a phase 1 trial of SMART for ovarian OM showing that dose escalation was safe. 26 Ugurluer et al 19 evaluated SMART in 21 patients treated to 24 liver metastases to a median total dose of 50 Gy in 5 fractions (BED = 100 Gy 10 ) and 83.7% of fractions were reoptimized; no grade 3+ toxicity was reported. In our study, there was no reported grade 3 or higher toxicity despite the median prescribed BED of 100 Gy 10 , adding to the evidence suggesting that SMART is an ideal strategy to deliver ablative dose even to lesions in challenging anatomic locations, such as lymph nodes in the abdomen and pelvis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Henke et al also published results of a phase 1 trial of SMART for ovarian OM showing that dose escalation was safe. 26 Ugurluer et al 19 evaluated SMART in 21 patients treated to 24 liver metastases to a median total dose of 50 Gy in 5 fractions (BED = 100 Gy 10 ) and 83.7% of fractions were reoptimized; no grade 3+ toxicity was reported. In our study, there was no reported grade 3 or higher toxicity despite the median prescribed BED of 100 Gy 10 , adding to the evidence suggesting that SMART is an ideal strategy to deliver ablative dose even to lesions in challenging anatomic locations, such as lymph nodes in the abdomen and pelvis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While few online adaptive radiation therapy (oART) treatment delivery systems have been released for clinical use over the past decade, there has been tremendous increase in the clinical applicability of these systems. [5,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] With oART, clinical teams now have the ability to create custom radiation therapy plans based on the patient's daily anatomy, rather than the patient's anatomy from treatment simulation images, which may have been days or weeks before treatment commencement [3]. While this new treatment delivery approach offers the potential to reduce the dose to healthy tissues, improve target localization, and increase tumor control, the technical, administrative, and implementation challenges associated with oART are significant [3,[15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the use of daily adaptation improved PTV opt , GTV V100, and GTV D95 coverage (Table 1 ) while alleviating the hard constraint violations. With regards to workflow, the overall treatment times were within the range of previously described treatment times for daily adaptation, and the decreased time per each consecutive fraction suggests that treatment times decrease with increased patient/staff familiarity [ 22 , 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%