2015
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-2607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase I Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475; Anti–PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody) in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

Abstract: Purpose: This phase I study evaluated the safety, maximum tolerated dose, antitumor activity, and pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Experimental Design: In a 3 + 3 dose escalation study, 10 patients received pembrolizumab 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks until progression or intolerable toxicity. Seven additional patients received 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Thirteen patients participated in a 3-week intrapatient dose escalati… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
442
1
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 638 publications
(472 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
23
442
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…S2. The exposure for pembrolizumab administered in combination with utomilumab was comparable with that observed with pembrolizumab alone (7).…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic and Ada Analysismentioning
confidence: 55%
“…S2. The exposure for pembrolizumab administered in combination with utomilumab was comparable with that observed with pembrolizumab alone (7).…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic and Ada Analysismentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Although conclusions drawn from cross‐study comparisons should be made with caution, and to the best of our knowledge the number of pan‐tumor clinical studies of ICI monotherapy is limited, this analysis of a large population of patients across a broad scope of tumor types suggests that avelumab was associated with an incidence of irAEs that is consistent with that of other ICIs 16, 17. Differences may be attributed to the specificity of avelumab for PD‐L1, which leaves PD‐L2/PD‐1 interactions intact and allows for maintenance of immune homeostasis18, 19; however, additional evidence is required to fully understand the contribution of PD‐L2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Few patients with NET have been treated so far with checkpoint inhibitors. Best response was stable disease in a patient with carcinoid and a patient with pancreatic NET (Patnaik et al 2015), and it remains unclear which NET patient subgroups might potentially benefit from this therapy. In light of the activity of pembrolizumab in small-cell lung cancer and Merkel cell carcinoma (Horn et al 2016, Nghiem et al 2016, the role of immunotherapy might be particularly relevant in high-grade NEC.…”
Section: Immunotherapy In Neuroendocrine Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%