1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-081x(199601)17:1<17::aid-bdd932>3.0.co;2-f
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
Pharmacokinetics and Food Interaction of Mk-462 in Healthy Males
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
22
3
2
1
Citation Types
2
15
1
0
Year Published
1996
2025
Publication Types
Select...
23
2
1
Relationship
2
24
Authors
Journals
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
References 1 publication
2
15
1
0
“…O f note, the time-to-peak growth hormone concentration was somewhat delayed and the magnitude of the peak somewhat less in the present study than previously reported with subcutaneous sumatriptan [24]. These findings are consistent with the pharmacokinetic differences between oral and subcutaneous administration of sumatriptan, with the latter producing higher and more rapid peak concentrations [31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…O f note, the time-to-peak growth hormone concentration was somewhat delayed and the magnitude of the peak somewhat less in the present study than previously reported with subcutaneous sumatriptan [24]. These findings are consistent with the pharmacokinetic differences between oral and subcutaneous administration of sumatriptan, with the latter producing higher and more rapid peak concentrations [31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The plasma concentrations observed following 20-40 mg MK-462 approximate the concentrations observed following 100 mg sumatriptan. Subsequent comparative investigation of MK-462 kinetics following intravenous and oral administration has determined oral bioavailability to be approximately 40% [31] and confirmed the suggestion from the present study of enhanced bioavailability relative to oral sumatriptan which displays an oral bioavailability of 14%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…As evident from these values, there was no significant effect of food on the pharmacokinetic parameters. In healthy volunteers, food increases the area under the curve (AUC) by about 20% and delays absorption of RIZ; however, there is no significant effect on C max and T max values [22]. In the present work the increase in AUC values was only about 5%, which can be attributed to genetic difference, race, age, gender (body size and muscle mass), type of food, and so forth.…”
Section: Application Of the Methods In Human Subjects And Incurredcontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…There were no other clinically significant findings. mg (10-60 mg kg − 1 ) in healthy male subjects [7]. Within this dose range, mean values of Cl, t 1/2 , MRT, and V ss were 1376 mL min − 1 , 1.8 h, 1.7 h, and 140 L, respectively [7].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…mg (10-60 mg kg − 1 ) in healthy male subjects [7]. Within this dose range, mean values of Cl, t 1/2 , MRT, and V ss were 1376 mL min − 1 , 1.8 h, 1.7 h, and 140 L, respectively [7]. Therefore, after IV rizatriptan administration, Cl and V ss in females appeared to be somewhat less in females than in males, whereas t 1/2 and MRT were similar between men and women.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
