2019
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phage Biocontrol of Campylobacter jejuni in Chickens Does Not Produce Collateral Effects on the Gut Microbiota

Abstract: Bacteriophage biocontrol to reduce Campylobacter jejuni levels in chickens can reduce human exposure and disease acquired through the consumption of contaminated poultry products. Investigating changes in the chicken microbiota during phage treatment has not previously been undertaken but is crucial to understanding the system-wide effects of such treatments to establish a sustainable application. A phage cocktail containing two virulent Campylobacter phages was used to treat broiler chickens colonized with C.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
75
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Richards et al used a mixture of two Campylobacter phages to treat chickens experimentally infected with C. jejuni and observed considerable reduction in Campylobacter counts in the intestinal tract throughout the 5-day treatment period, but the most obvious difference was seen 2 days after the initiation of the treatment. 119 Using experimentally infected broiler chickens, Wagenaar et al demonstrated that phage therapy effectively decreased Campylobacter colonization when given either before Campylobacter inoculation as a preventive measure or after Campylobacter infection was established as a therapeutic approach. 117 The authors also noticed that the effect was most obvious for the first few days after the initiation of phage therapy.…”
Section: New and Non-antibiotic Approaches To The Control Of Campylobmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Richards et al used a mixture of two Campylobacter phages to treat chickens experimentally infected with C. jejuni and observed considerable reduction in Campylobacter counts in the intestinal tract throughout the 5-day treatment period, but the most obvious difference was seen 2 days after the initiation of the treatment. 119 Using experimentally infected broiler chickens, Wagenaar et al demonstrated that phage therapy effectively decreased Campylobacter colonization when given either before Campylobacter inoculation as a preventive measure or after Campylobacter infection was established as a therapeutic approach. 117 The authors also noticed that the effect was most obvious for the first few days after the initiation of phage therapy.…”
Section: New and Non-antibiotic Approaches To The Control Of Campylobmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no doubt that the prevalence of Campylobacter in both developed and developing countries needs to be limited, and in response to this the European Union has placed a limit of 1000 CFU/g on broiler chicken carcasses (Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1495). Researchers have shown promising results using phages to reduce the level of Campylobacter on chicken carcasses [9][10][11][12], and in vivo without affecting the host microbiota structure [13][14][15][16][17]. We believe phage treatment is particularly suitable for applications in developing countries since phage products are relatively low-cost and robust and can be safely handled and incorporated into local good practice guidelines for farm and slaughterhouse use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For wider activity and greater potency against C. jejuni, it is advisable that polyphage applications (phage cocktails) targeting this pathogen be comprised of the representatives of both CPS-specific and flagellotropic phages or to administer the phages from these groups successively [37,88]. Prevention of recycling of phages reduces resistance rates in a farm environment, therefore conducting phage therapy in birds 1-2 days prior to slaughter could help to avoid resistance [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%