2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.116.081801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perturbed Lepton-Specific Two-Higgs-Doublet Model Facing Experimental Hints for Physics beyond the Standard Model

Abstract: BABAR, Belle, and LHCb Collaborations report evidence for new physics in B → Dτν and B → D Ã τν of approximately 3.8σ. There is also the long lasting discrepancy of about 3σ in the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, and the branching ratio for τ → μνν is 1.8σ (2.4σ) above the standard model expectation using the HFAG (PDG) values. Furthermore, CMS Collaboration finds hints for a nonzero decay rate of h → μτ. Interestingly, all these observations can be explained by introducing new scalars. In this Letter w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
173
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
(143 reference statements)
0
173
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shape of the distribution ofB → D −ν is a consequence of the fact that the only contribution to the rate that is not suppressed by m 2 in the SM, enters through Γ 0− in eqs. (30,29) and behaves as ∼ sin 2 θ . In particular, we see another manifestation of the smallness of the forward- backward asymmetry (A F B ) in this case.…”
Section: Phenomenologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The shape of the distribution ofB → D −ν is a consequence of the fact that the only contribution to the rate that is not suppressed by m 2 in the SM, enters through Γ 0− in eqs. (30,29) and behaves as ∼ sin 2 θ . In particular, we see another manifestation of the smallness of the forward- backward asymmetry (A F B ) in this case.…”
Section: Phenomenologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrepancy between experiment and the SM is at the level of 4σ, and it can be explained with new physics (NP) [11,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. These analyses of the data are most fruitful when casted model-independently in an effective field theoretical framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An explanation of the anomalies via loop effects, on the other hand, typically leads to correlated imprints on other observables like the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon (a µ ). It is thus appealing to investigate the possibility of a simultaneous solution of the flavor anomalies and the long-standing tension in (g − 2) µ at the loop level, for example by light Z bosons [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48], leptoquarks [38,49,50] or new fermions and scalars [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61] (see ref. [62] for a review on the situation in SUSY).…”
Section: Jhep04(2017)043mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is well motivated to search for a simultaneous explanation of these two anomalies [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Furthermore, since a e agrees with the SM prediction, also a µ can be considered as a LFUV quantity and one can address it together with R(D ( * ) ) and/or b → sµ + µ − [13,[21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%