Perspectives on Labor Polysemy: Theoretical Foundations and Study Possibilities

Abstract

Purpose: To understand the meaning and meaningfulness of work under different points of view and support the researchers of the subject to reflect on which lens(es) are formulating their research. Originality/value: The main contribution of the article is in the synthesis and registration of ten categories of analysis of the multiple and possible meaning and meaningfulness of the work, either in isolation or in their connections. This article is in itself a theoretical proposition cooperates for the extension of the literature and is original when indicating ten complementary perspectives for the object of study: physiological, cultural, religious, spiritual, ideological, economic, political, legal, psychological and social. Design/methodology/approach: This article has a qualitative approach and has as a method a literature review of the narrative type and is based on more than 80 national and international references. Findings: When analyzed in an integrated way, these perspectives expand the possibilities of contextualization and future researches in the field of the mentioned subject. Finally, it is defended that there is still a long way in the problematization of this phenomenon so central in the life of the individuals and for the society, mainly in what concerns the current context of multiple crises and intense social transformations.

Los Diferentes Discursos Y Narrativas Del Futuro De Trabajo

“…El trabajo es un término polisémico, es decir, que permite diferentes interpretaciones (Colomby & Costa, 2018). Con la acción del individuo, puede referirse a la implicación de la fuerza física y/o esfuerzo intelectual para lograr un determinado propósito y también puede ser actividad de transformación de la naturaleza, un servicio, profesión, oficio u ocupación (Albornoz, 2008).…”

“…El trabajo puede entenderse como un fenómeno en constante transformación, que se reinventa con cambios sociopolítico-económicos, haciendo que su concepto sea polisémico, versátil y transdisciplinario (Colomby & Costa, 2018). Su reconocido potencial investigativo se mantiene siempre en la agenda de la investigación académica y con la atención de los autores de las más diferentes corrientes teóricas.…”