Perspectives on computing ethics: a multi-stakeholder analysis

Abstract

Purpose Computing ethics represents a long established, yet rapidly evolving, discipline that grows in complexity and scope on a near-daily basis. Therefore, to help understand some of that scope it is essential to incorporate a range of perspectives, from a range of stakeholders, on current and emerging ethical challenges associated with computer technology. This study aims to achieve this by using, a three-pronged, stakeholder analysis of Computer Science academics, ICT industry professionals, and citizen groups was undertaken to explore what they consider to be crucial computing ethics concerns. The overlap between these stakeholder groups are explored, as well as whether their concerns are reflected in the existing literature. Design/methodology/approach Data collection was performed using focus groups, and the data was analysed using a thematic analysis. The data was also analysed to determine if there were overlaps between the literature and the stakeholders’ concerns and attitudes towards computing ethics. Findings The results of the focus group analysis show a mixture of overlapping concerns between the different groups, as well as some concerns that are unique to each of the specific groups. All groups stressed the importance of data as a key topic in computing ethics. This includes concerns around the accuracy, completeness and representativeness of data sets used to develop computing applications. Academics were concerned with the best ways to teach computing ethics to university students. Industry professionals believed that a lack of diversity in software teams resulted in important questions not being asked during design and development. Citizens discussed at length the negative and unexpected impacts of social media applications. These are all topics that have gained broad coverage in the literature. Social implications In recent years, the impact of ICT on society and the environment at large has grown tremendously. From this fast-paced growth, a myriad of ethical concerns have arisen. The analysis aims to shed light on what a diverse group of stakeholders consider the most important social impacts of technology and whether these concerns are reflected in the literature on computing ethics. The outcomes of this analysis will form the basis for new teaching content that will be developed in future to help illuminate and address these concerns. Originality/value The multi-stakeholder analysis provides individual and differing perspectives on the issues related to the rapidly evolving discipline of computing ethics.

The Bad and the Ugly: Reflections on the Use of Invigilator App by First-Year Students in English Proficiency for University Studies at an Odel University in South Africa

“…Another issue of interest that was raised by some female students is the concern regarding uploading of selfies. This supports the view by Chawki and Shazly [8] that female students and staff tend to be more cautious about sharing their webcams, as they are more likely to be harassed and exposed to aggressive behaviours in an online setting. It is therefore possible that for the student (SQf2) it was important to upload a photo that would represent her image in a manner that would satisfy her.…”

“…This possibly compromises some ethical principles. During the Covid-19 emergency, many universities were unable to obtain so-called "wet signatures" for explicit consent forms from students for this new approach of using e-proctoring systems [8]. Some disparities have also been reported about the pictures taken with a webcam.…”

“…Many researchers have raised a concern that in some instances systems failed to properly identify students with dark skin and forced them to take extra measures to ensure that they complied with the requirements of the technology [3]. The same view is expressed by Langenfeld who asserts that at least one of these systems have trouble detecting people of colour [8]. One may deduce that face detection may be a cause for concern for this group of people whose faces cannot be detected by the e-proctoring system thus leading to a false e-proctoring report.…”

“…It is therefore possible that for the student (SQf2) it was important to upload a photo that would represent her image in a manner that would satisfy her. Students seem to be particularly concerned about their peers' perceptions of them [8].…”

Higher education in turbulent times: navigating the transition from un-sustainability in a world dominated by technology

“…Academics who participated in a 2021 study on ethics in computer science courses noted that ethics were often considered in standalone modules in a manner that did not reflect the distributed and interrelated aspects of cross-cutting concerns. Courses also lacked coverage of the environmental impacts of ICT (Gordon et al, 2021). In a Portuguese study on engineering education, Monteiro et al (2019) found that consideration of ethics was limited, with most curricula based on a perspective where an engineer is seen as a "neutral Higher education technician".…”