2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2010.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perspectives on biological growth and remodeling

Abstract: The continuum mechanical treatment of biological growth and remodeling has attracted considerable attention over the past fifteen years. Many aspects of these problems are now wellunderstood, yet there remain areas in need of significant development from the standpoint of experiments, theory, and computation. In this perspective paper we review the state of the field and highlight open questions, challenges, and avenues for further development.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
325
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 382 publications
(329 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
(131 reference statements)
3
325
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Tissue remodelling is the process by which cells can rearrange their orientation and position with respect to each other as well as to move, reorient and degrade the extracellular matrix in which they are sitting. The driving force for remodelling has its origin in the thermodynamics of the irreversible process controlled by the dissipation; for details, we refer to [36] and the contributions by Ambrosi et al [24,33,34]. With these assumptions, we show that the problem reduces to a single free parameter interpreted as a critical curvature for tissue growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tissue remodelling is the process by which cells can rearrange their orientation and position with respect to each other as well as to move, reorient and degrade the extracellular matrix in which they are sitting. The driving force for remodelling has its origin in the thermodynamics of the irreversible process controlled by the dissipation; for details, we refer to [36] and the contributions by Ambrosi et al [24,33,34]. With these assumptions, we show that the problem reduces to a single free parameter interpreted as a critical curvature for tissue growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[8,24,25]) and they often use rather subtle material models, including second gradient approaches (see e.g. [26,27] and [28] for a recent overview).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These deposition-degradation changes implicitly imply the growth of the tissue or, to be more precise, changes in volume, density or both. There have been different approaches to the computational modeling of growth and adaptation has seen different approaches in the context of biological tissue, see, e.g, Taber (1995);van der Meulen & Prendergast (2000); Kelly & Prendergast (2005); Ambrosi et al (2011);Jones & Chapman (2012). One fundamental difference, when compared to non-living materials, is related to the open and closed system approximation, see, e.g., Kuhl & Steinmann (2003).…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach allows to model different remodeling processes in biological tissues, and with the appropriate experiments could lead to a better knowledge of how biological tissue adapts to its specific environment. Combined with the development of a growth model (see [32,4]) our approach could help modeling and predicting the overall behavior of tissue reacting to external stimuli, via the reorientation and growth (positive or negative), of its microstructure. We believe it have been and will represent a challenging area of research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%