2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00289-019-02952-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perspective on the mechanical response of pineapple leaf filler/toughened epoxy composites under diverse constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This happens because filler's effective dispersion and inclusion improve crosslink bonding between matrix and reinforced materials. [ 30 ] Figure 13C showed matrix accumulation with filler pull‐out and filler breakage at the fracture surface, indicating better interfacial bonding between reinforcement and matrix materials. Therefore, up to 7.5% of filler loading analyzed higher thermo‐mechanical properties with minor deformation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This happens because filler's effective dispersion and inclusion improve crosslink bonding between matrix and reinforced materials. [ 30 ] Figure 13C showed matrix accumulation with filler pull‐out and filler breakage at the fracture surface, indicating better interfacial bonding between reinforcement and matrix materials. Therefore, up to 7.5% of filler loading analyzed higher thermo‐mechanical properties with minor deformation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 12 h, the samples are separated from the molds. [ 30 ] Table 1 shows the sample code for jute filler reinforced composite with the weight percentage of jute particulate and epoxy resin material.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34,35 A threepoints flexural test was performed according to ASTM Standard D 790-10. 36,37 A Zwick R5LB041 digital Shore hardness tester (Zwick Roell, Ulm, Germany) measured the composite's Rockwell hardness according to ASTM D 785-98. 38 Impact energy for unnotched composite specimens was measured using an Instron (CEAST 9050) impact pendulum tester based on ASTM D 256 standards.…”
Section: Fabrication and Characterization Of The Compositementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tensile testing was performed under ASTM Standard D 3039 M‐95 34,35 . A three‐points flexural test was performed according to ASTM Standard D 790–10 36,37 . A Zwick R5LB041 digital Shore hardness tester (Zwick Roell, Ulm, Germany) measured the composite's Rockwell hardness according to ASTM D 785–98 38 .…”
Section: Fabrication and Characterization Of The Compositementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prepared samples were cured at atmospheric temperature for 12 h and then removed from the silicon rubber mold. 26 Table 2 depicts the specimen code for PRC with the corresponding weight fraction of pineapple leaf particulates and the used resin material.…”
Section: Preparation Of Fiber-reinforced Polymeric Composite (Frp)mentioning
confidence: 99%