2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalized assessment of cervical length improves prediction of spontaneous preterm birth: a standard and a percentile calculator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
2
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Such MoM models are akin to customized standards of estimated fetal weight 91,92 and cervical length. 93 After removing the effect of gestational age and maternal characteristics on biomarker levels, any remaining abnormality in MoM values in cases relative to controls is considered independent evidence that can be used to improve accuracy of predictions. However, our approach differs from the FMF in several aspects.…”
Section: Ajogorgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such MoM models are akin to customized standards of estimated fetal weight 91,92 and cervical length. 93 After removing the effect of gestational age and maternal characteristics on biomarker levels, any remaining abnormality in MoM values in cases relative to controls is considered independent evidence that can be used to improve accuracy of predictions. However, our approach differs from the FMF in several aspects.…”
Section: Ajogorgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy is also effective in women with a previous preterm birth and a short cervix and is as effective as cervical cerclage (23). Moreover, to implement this work in clinical practice, a calculator has been developed to calculate the risk of preterm delivery incorporating cervical length, as well as maternal characteristics such as weight, height, parity, and gestational age (24).…”
Section: Perinatology Research Branch (Prb)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the complex public health problem of preterm birth, the development of biomarkers for preterm labor is necessary 25 – 28 . Currently, risk modeling of preterm birth relies on maternal factors: a history of preterm birth 29 , of late miscarriage 30 or cervical excisional surgery 31 , a sonographic short cervix 32 , a low customized cervical length percentile 33 during the current pregnancy, amniotic fluid sludge 34 , and an abnormal cervical consistency index 35 . Biochemical markers, e.g., fFN 36 , PIGFBP-1 37 , PAMG-1 38 , inflammatory cytokines 39 , and cervical acetate 40 , as well as the vaginal microbiome 41 and maternal blood transcriptome 42 , have also been suggested as predictive of preterm birth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%