Personal music systems and hearing

Uppunda, Ajith Kumar; Deepashree, S R

doi:10.1017/s0022215116001031

Cited by 23 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The overall effect size of the DPOAEs was 0.089 (CI −0.012 to 0.190; p 0.080, I 2 0%), indicating no significant amplitude change within 24 h after music exposure. In sum, the short-term result after music exposure did not show any meaningful changes for PTA thresholds or DPOAE amplitudes To identify the long-term hearing changes after music exposure [9,21,22,24,26,30,31,33,34], the pooled studies for analysis are shown in Figures 4 and 5 for PTA and DPOAE, respectively, in the same frequencies along with the short-term hearing changes. Similar to PTA outputs, the amplitude of DPOAEs showed the largest effect size also at 4 kHz (0.124, CI −0.047 to 0.296; p 0.155) (see Figure 3).…”

Section: Meta-analysis Of Music Exposure Effects With Subgroup Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The authors confirmed that four [9,[20][21][22] of the selected studies had "good" quality (scored 7-9). The remaining studies were evaluated as having "fair" quality (score 4-6) [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] except for one study with a score of 3, evaluated as having "poor" quality [35]. Thus, 16 articles were included for systematic review and meta-analysis in this study.…”

Section: Selection Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Sixteen high-quality studies that reported hearing thresholds of PTA (4, 6, and 8 kHz testing frequencies) and amplitudes of the DPOAEs (2, 4, and 6 center frequencies) were pooled for analysis. As mentioned earlier, the studies were divided into two groups to see short-term hearing changes (pre/post-exposure with 24 hours; n = 7) [20,23,25,[27][28][29]32] and long-term hearing changes (PLDs users/non-users; n = 9) [9,21,22,24,26,30,31,33,34]. For short-term hearing changes within 24 h after music exposure [20,23,25,[27][28][29]32], the studies pooled for analysis showed PTA 4, 6, and 8 kHz changes at pre-and post-music exposure (see Figure 2).…”

Section: Meta-analysis Of Music Exposure Effects With Subgroup Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To identify the long-term hearing changes after music exposure [9,21,22,24,26,30,31,33,34], the pooled studies for analysis are shown in Figures 4 and 5 for PTA and DPOAE, respectively, in the same frequencies along with the short-term hearing changes. With the DPOAEs, the highest effect size was at 2 kHz (0.135, CI −0.127 to 0.398; p 0.311) and 4 kHz (0.131, CI −0.131 to 0.393; p 0.329) with medium (I 2 58.77%), and high (I 2 76.65%) heterogeneity, respectively.…”

Section: Meta-analysis Of Music Exposure Effects With Subgroup Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The Effects of Short-Term and Long-term Hearing Changes on Music Exposure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

You

Kong

Han

2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study explores the scientific evidence on whether music exposure temporarily or permanently affects hearing sensitivity in young adults. Six electronic databases were searched using related keywords for the four categories of personal listening devices, listening habits, hearing outcomes, and age. The Hedges’ g and its 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. A Higgins I2 was also used to check for heterogeneity. To test for publication bias, funnel plots were drawn using Egger’s regression. Based on the inclusion criteria, 16 studies were divided into two groups to identify short-term hearing changes (n = 7) and long-term hearing changes (n = 9). In the short term, there was no significant immediate change in the thresholds or amplitudes after the music exposure, although pure-tone thresholds (PTAs) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) did show the highest effect size (−0.344, CI −0.727 to 0.038) and (0.124, CI −0.047 to 0.296) at 4 kHz. On the other hand, for long-term hearing changes, the PTA provided the highest effect size at 6 kHz (−0.525, CI −0.897 to −0.154) and 8 kHz (–0.486, CI −0.819 to −0.152), while also implying that habitual and repeated personal listening device (PLD) usage can act on some significant hearing changes in audiological tests. We conclude that the use of a PLD produces a few temporary hearing changes at 4 kHz after its use but that the changes are then reversed. However, it is important to note heavy PLD users’ experience regarding permanent changes in their hearing thresholds at high frequencies, and the public should be educated on this issue.

show abstract

Section: Meta-analysis Of Music Exposure Effects With Subgroup Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Selection Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Meta-analysis Of Music Exposure Effects With Subgroup Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Meta-analysis Of Music Exposure Effects With Subgroup Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Effects of Short-Term and Long-term Hearing Changes on Music Exposure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

You

Kong

Han

2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…3 The contention that personal music systems used at high volume are harmful to hearing is corroborated by Kumar and Deepashree's experimental work involving 60 participants. 4 The authors found that personal music systems used at high volumes led to: elevated high frequency thresholds, reduced frequency discrimination and temporal modulation detection, and poor speech perception. This puts in perspective university students' attitudes towards hearing loss caused by attendance at night clubs.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%