2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2016.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personal assessment of intimacy in relationships: Validity and measurement invariance across gender

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Constant et al ., examined the reliability of the questionnaire using Cronbach's alpha, with coefficients ranging from 0.72 to 0.86. [ 28 ] Moreover, in the research of Wubbolding and Wubbolding, the reliability of MIQ was confirmed with Cronbach's alpha and coefficient of 0.76. [ 29 ] In the present study, Cronbach's alpha of the 0.87 questionnaire was obtained.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Constant et al ., examined the reliability of the questionnaire using Cronbach's alpha, with coefficients ranging from 0.72 to 0.86. [ 28 ] Moreover, in the research of Wubbolding and Wubbolding, the reliability of MIQ was confirmed with Cronbach's alpha and coefficient of 0.76. [ 29 ] In the present study, Cronbach's alpha of the 0.87 questionnaire was obtained.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore, it is questionable whether certain behaviors are interpreted in the same manner by female and male adolescents. Several studies have identified and expressed the need to carefully assess whether groups can be compared on sexual attitudes, before actual comparisons on latent means can be made (Constant et al, 2016; Crawford & Popp, 2003; Emmerink et al, 2017; Jardin et al, 2017; Zhou et al, 2014). Indeed, when a scale is used, the question often remains if the scale items are a good representation of the underlying construct (Sakaluk & Fisher, 2019), and if one can compare scale items between groups (e.g., cultural groups, religious groups, gender) or across repeated measures.…”
Section: Methodological Limitations Of Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relationship intimacy was measured using the Personal Assessment of Intimacy in Relationships (PAIR). 30 Our research team (see Acknowledgments) adapted in French the PINQ, the questionnaires developed by Contant et al 26,27 and the questionnaire created by Rini et al, 29 according to international guidelines.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%