2018
DOI: 10.1080/13540602.2018.1476337
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personal and contextual factors related to teachers’ experience with stress and burnout

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
70
1
10

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
70
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…There is strong body of evidence showing that social interrelations can promote teachers' wellbeing (e.g., Berkovich and Eyal 2018;Hakanen et al 2006). For instance, positive relationships with colleagues have been shown to buffer teacher stress (e.g., Richards et al 2018). However, social interaction within the professional community and with pupils does not automatically increase teacher wellbeing.…”
Section: Teachers' Socio-contextual Burnoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is strong body of evidence showing that social interrelations can promote teachers' wellbeing (e.g., Berkovich and Eyal 2018;Hakanen et al 2006). For instance, positive relationships with colleagues have been shown to buffer teacher stress (e.g., Richards et al 2018). However, social interaction within the professional community and with pupils does not automatically increase teacher wellbeing.…”
Section: Teachers' Socio-contextual Burnoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive previous research on teacher burnout has identified several individual and environmental antecedents for teacher burnout, such as workload and years of teaching experience (Brewer and Shapard 2004;Gavish and Friedman 2010;van Droogenbroeck et al 2014). Also, the importance of social interrelations to teachers' wellbeing has been emphasized (Hakanen et al 2006;Richards et al 2018). However, we still know surprisingly little about individual variations in burnout risk experienced by in-service teachers (Bianchi et al 2015;Brudnik 2004;Hultell et al 2013), especially in terms of primary social interactions of teachers' work, i.e., with pupils and the professional community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various contextual factors can influence teacher stress such as increased job demands, interpersonal difficulties, and challenging student behaviour (Kokkinos, 2007;Richards, Hemphill, & Templin, 2018;Stoeber, & Rennert, 2008). Research suggests that teachers are more susceptible to work-related stressors and psychological distress compared to other occupations (Johnson et al, 2005;Van Droogenbroeck & Spruty, 2015).…”
Section: Teaching Stressors and Psychological Distressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estos hallazgos sugieren que, además de existir una relación directa entre inteligencia emocional y engagement docente, el afrontamiento resiliente podría ser una estrategia adicional que emplearían los Tabla 1 Estadísticos descriptivos y correlaciones de las variables objeto de estudio docentes emocionalmente inteligentes (Zeidner y Matthews, 2018). Así, estos resultados apoyan el argumento de que los docentes con mayor habilidad auto-percibida para percibir, comprender y regular sus estados emocionales y los de su alumnado desarrollan estrategias más resilientes para afrontar los contratiempos y adversidades que pueden surgir en el contexto educativo (Richards, Hemphill y Templin, 2018), utilizando formas creativas, optimistas y de desarrollo personal para afrontarlos, lo cual podría redundar en mayores niveles de ilusión en su trabajo. Por el contrario, es posible que los docentes con bajos niveles de inteligencia emocional no sepan desarrollar estrategias resilientes ante las adversidades educativas a las que se enfrentan diariamente en el aula y, por ello, empiecen a experimentar niveles más bajos de ilusión hacia la enseñanza, menor energía, más baja dedicación hacia sus alumnos y menos momentos de absorción en clase.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified