2000
DOI: 10.1002/1098-108x(200101)29:1<65::aid-eat10>3.0.co;2-y
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Person � situation interactions in body dissatisfaction
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
63
5
4
1
Citation Types
2
25
0
0
Year Published
Range
2000
20002025
2025Publication Types
Select...
70
1
1
Relationship
0
72
Authors
Journals
Cited by 72 publications
(27 citation statements)
References 10 publications
2
25
0
0
Order By: Relevance
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“……”
Section: The Concept Of Body Image Disturbance
supporting
confidence: 86%
“……”
Section: Body Image Fluctuations
mentioning
confidence: 51%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“……”
Section: The Concept Of Body Image Disturbance
supporting
confidence: 86%
“……”
Section: Body Image Fluctuations
mentioning
confidence: 51%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…17 However, what appeared most crucial to body image experience in the current study, was the fluctuation of body image experience across different situational contexts and times (state body image). 3,23–25,27–28 This aligns with Merleau-Ponty's perspectives of embodiment in that the body is central to experience. 30–31 Therefore, the current findings appear best explained through both trait (stable) and state (situational) components.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 63%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In conclusion, the present findings of situational effects in body dissatisfaction should not lead to underestimating the role of personal factors in body satisfaction (Tiggemann, 2001). Subjective body evaluation most likely has both stable and dynamic components (Haimovitz et al, 1992; Tiggemann, 2001).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 42%
“…In conclusion, the present findings of situational effects in body dissatisfaction should not lead to underestimating the role of personal factors in body satisfaction (Tiggemann, 2001). Subjective body evaluation most likely has both stable and dynamic components (Haimovitz et al, 1992; Tiggemann, 2001). High correlations between situations or contexts indicate that there is cross‐situational consistency which points towards a more general level of body esteem characteristic of the individual (Tiggemann, 2001).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 42%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“……”
Section: The Concept Of Body Image Disturbance
supporting
confidence: 86%
“……”
Section: Body Image Fluctuations
mentioning
confidence: 51%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…17 However, what appeared most crucial to body image experience in the current study, was the fluctuation of body image experience across different situational contexts and times (state body image). 3,23–25,27–28 This aligns with Merleau-Ponty's perspectives of embodiment in that the body is central to experience. 30–31 Therefore, the current findings appear best explained through both trait (stable) and state (situational) components.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 63%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In conclusion, the present findings of situational effects in body dissatisfaction should not lead to underestimating the role of personal factors in body satisfaction (Tiggemann, 2001). Subjective body evaluation most likely has both stable and dynamic components (Haimovitz et al, 1992; Tiggemann, 2001).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 42%
“…In conclusion, the present findings of situational effects in body dissatisfaction should not lead to underestimating the role of personal factors in body satisfaction (Tiggemann, 2001). Subjective body evaluation most likely has both stable and dynamic components (Haimovitz et al, 1992; Tiggemann, 2001). High correlations between situations or contexts indicate that there is cross‐situational consistency which points towards a more general level of body esteem characteristic of the individual (Tiggemann, 2001).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 42%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“……”
Section: The Concept Of Body Image Disturbance
supporting
confidence: 86%
“……”
Section: Body Image Fluctuations
mentioning
confidence: 51%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…17 However, what appeared most crucial to body image experience in the current study, was the fluctuation of body image experience across different situational contexts and times (state body image). 3,23–25,27–28 This aligns with Merleau-Ponty's perspectives of embodiment in that the body is central to experience. 30–31 Therefore, the current findings appear best explained through both trait (stable) and state (situational) components.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 63%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In conclusion, the present findings of situational effects in body dissatisfaction should not lead to underestimating the role of personal factors in body satisfaction (Tiggemann, 2001). Subjective body evaluation most likely has both stable and dynamic components (Haimovitz et al, 1992; Tiggemann, 2001).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 42%
“…In conclusion, the present findings of situational effects in body dissatisfaction should not lead to underestimating the role of personal factors in body satisfaction (Tiggemann, 2001). Subjective body evaluation most likely has both stable and dynamic components (Haimovitz et al, 1992; Tiggemann, 2001). High correlations between situations or contexts indicate that there is cross‐situational consistency which points towards a more general level of body esteem characteristic of the individual (Tiggemann, 2001).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 42%