2019
DOI: 10.1177/1038416219870205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Person–environment fit at work: Relationships with workplace behaviours

Abstract: The fit between the values of an individual and the work environment (person–organisation fit) is related to organisational citizenship behaviours and counterproductive work behaviours. Research has found that job satisfaction is a predictor of organisational citizenship behaviours and counterproductive work behaviours. Meanwhile, person–organisation fit is highly predictive of job satisfaction; thus, it is unclear if person–organisation fit relates to the use of organisational citizenship behaviours and count… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…JS directly affects OCBs, and it can explain some portions of these behaviors [3,21]. Starting from the 1970s, considerable attention has been given to the causal relationship between JS and OCBs.…”
Section: Job Satisfaction As An Antecedent Of Work Engagement and Ocbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…JS directly affects OCBs, and it can explain some portions of these behaviors [3,21]. Starting from the 1970s, considerable attention has been given to the causal relationship between JS and OCBs.…”
Section: Job Satisfaction As An Antecedent Of Work Engagement and Ocbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, previous studies examined P-J fit (Scroggins;2008;Ünal, 2017;De Crom & Rothmann, 2018;Sylva et al, 2019) and P-O fit (Kristof-Brown;1996;James, 2003;van Vianen et al, 2007) separately. Generally, studies investigate positive outcomes of P-O fit and P-J fit (Rahmadani & Sebayang, 2017;Stone et al, 2019), studies on P-G fit are limited. Besides, we followed suggestions by several researchers that a distinct level of fit in P-E fit should be studied with different dimensions and outcomes (Werbel & Gilliland, 1999;Su et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on P-O fit and P-J fit have been extensively studied but P-G fit is neglected in the literature (Kristof-Brown, et al, 2005;Rahmadani & Sebayang, 2017;Ünal, 2017;Stone et al, 2019). Thus, this is the second motivation for this paper, to explore and offer an insight into integrating all three constructs of P-E fit, as well as to provide an in-depth understanding on how these constructs are related to each other.…”
Section: International Journal Of Human Resource Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two types of POF: complementary fit (when an individual complements or meets the needs of the organisation); and supplementary fit (when the organisation provides an individual with outcomes they value). For the latter, job context carries significant weight where ECAs would be expected to select organisations that satisfy their financial, inter-personal and psychological needs (Supeli and Creed 2014;Stone et al 2019). This can be attributed to congruence either between personal and organisational values, the needs of both the individual and the organisation (Cable and Judge 1996), or between individual goals and those of an organisation (Schneider 1987).…”
Section: Work Context and Person-organisation Fit Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%