2006
DOI: 10.1002/eji.200635883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistent antigenic stimulation alters the transcription program in T cells, resulting in antigen‐specific tolerance

Abstract: Repetitive antigen stimulation induces peripheral T cell tolerance in vivo. It is not known, however, whether multiple stimulations merely suppress T cell activation or, alternatively, change the transcriptional program to a distinct, tolerant state. In this study, we have discovered that STAT3 and STAT5 were activated in response to antigen stimulation in vivo, in marked contrast to the suppression of AP-1, NF-jB and NFAT. In addition, a number of transcription factors were induced in tolerant T cells followi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
70
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
6
70
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, it was determined that Egr-2 could also participate in FasL transcription [9,14]. More recently, our group has identified Egr-2 and Egr-3 as negative regulators of T cell function [15][16][17]. Egr-2 and Egr-3 expression is upregulated in models of anergy in vitro and in vivo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, it was determined that Egr-2 could also participate in FasL transcription [9,14]. More recently, our group has identified Egr-2 and Egr-3 as negative regulators of T cell function [15][16][17]. Egr-2 and Egr-3 expression is upregulated in models of anergy in vitro and in vivo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because Egr-2 has been previously characterised and found to be highly upregulated in immune tolerance, these results generated from MicroPath are biologically significant because as expected, those genes that were highly expressed in our tolerance Vs activated datasets were found to be insignificantly expressed in our p-KOA6 Vs WTA6 and p-KOA0 Vs WTA0 datasets (from which the Egr-2 gene was knocked out of the cell lines). Amongst these genes, Ap1s1, Shd, Surf6, Vil2, Lilrb4, Tbx21 and Pdcd1lg2 ( Table 2) have been confirmed to be upregulated in the process of immune tolerance [20], all of which were found to exhibit low expression values in our knock-out expression datasets. This consistent gene expression pattern can be seen graphically in Figure 3.…”
Section: Comparison Of Gene Expression Profiles Pertaining To Immune mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Candidates for NFAT partners in anergy induction are the Egr factors Egr-2 and Egr-3, which were found to be induced and to suppress lymphokine synthesis in anergic A.E7 cells [34,35] and other anergic T cells [36]. When A.E7 cells, a CD4 + Th clone specific for a pigeon cytochrome c (PCC) peptide, were (pre-) treated with ionomycin or PCC peptide for anergy induction, LAT (linker for activation of T cells) was detected as the most upstream sensitive signalling molecule [37].…”
Section: Introduction: Peripheral Tolerance and Nfat Transcription Famentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While anergy induction by NFATc2 mutated in its AP-1 contact sites [28] suggests that NFAT factors alone or together with binding partners other than AP-1 suppress IL-2 synthesis, neither such NFAT partner(s) nor details of NFATmediated suppressive effects on IL-2 synthesis in anergy induction have been unravelled so far. Are the promoters of E3 ligase genes indeed direct targets of NFAT factors, and if so, in which context are they bound and controlled by NFAT?Candidates for NFAT partners in anergy induction are the Egr factors Egr-2 and Egr-3, which were found to be induced and to suppress lymphokine synthesis in anergic A.E7 cells [34,35] and other anergic T cells [36]. When A.E7 cells, a CD4 + Th clone specific for a pigeon cytochrome c (PCC) peptide, were (pre-) treated with ionomycin or PCC peptide for anergy induction, LAT (linker for activation of T cells) was detected as the most upstream sensitive signalling molecule [37].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%