2019
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2019.801.132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistence Behaviour of Pre-Mix Formulation of Profenophos and Cypermethrinin/on Sapota Fruit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The waiting period worked out for cypermethrin was 5.16 days at SD and 8.42 days at 2×SD (Table 2). Similar work has been done by Solanki et al (2019) using combiproduct of chlorpyrifos and cypermethrin in sapota and have reported waiting period of 4 to 5 days used as combi-product. Likewise, Gupta et al (2011) have studied the persistence of the chlorpyrifos, profenofos and cypermethrin in tomato using pre-mix formulation (Chlorpyriphos 50% + Cypermethrin 5%) and (Profenofos 40% + Cypermethrin 5%) and found that in pre-mix formulation the residues of profenofos persisted up to 7-15 days while the residues of cypermethrin and chlorpyrifos persist up to 0-7 days only.…”
Section: Dissipation Studysupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The waiting period worked out for cypermethrin was 5.16 days at SD and 8.42 days at 2×SD (Table 2). Similar work has been done by Solanki et al (2019) using combiproduct of chlorpyrifos and cypermethrin in sapota and have reported waiting period of 4 to 5 days used as combi-product. Likewise, Gupta et al (2011) have studied the persistence of the chlorpyrifos, profenofos and cypermethrin in tomato using pre-mix formulation (Chlorpyriphos 50% + Cypermethrin 5%) and (Profenofos 40% + Cypermethrin 5%) and found that in pre-mix formulation the residues of profenofos persisted up to 7-15 days while the residues of cypermethrin and chlorpyrifos persist up to 0-7 days only.…”
Section: Dissipation Studysupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Prior to analysis, soil samples were mixed thoroughly, air dried milled and passed through 2 mm sieve and then subjected to pesticide residues analysis. Extraction and clean-up of profenofos and cypermethrin residues in sapota fruits and soil were carried out according to QuEChERS method with certain modifications (Sharma, 2013;Solanki et al, 2019).…”
Section: Sample Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present finding on DT 50 of chlorantraniliprole is differing from the results reported with DT 50 for cauliflower 1.25–1.36 days ( Kar et al., 2012 ), tomato 3.30 days ( Malhat et al., 2012 ) okra 1.60–1.70 days ( Vijayasree et al., 2015 ), brinjal 1.58–1.80 days ( Vijayasree et al., 2015 ), green chilli 1.58–1.80 days ( Ahlawat et al., 2019 ), 1.26 days ( Paramasivam, 2020 ). This variation might be the resultant of the prevailing environmental factors and processes viz., temperature, relative humidity, volatilization and photo-degradation at field conditions ( Dong et al., 2011 ; Kar et al., 2012 ; Zhang et al., 2012 ; Solanki et al., 2019 ; Paramasivam, 2020 ) which are not consistent in different geographical regions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The pace of consumption of above combination product is picked in the past few years among the farmers of India to beat losses of pigeonpea. The residues of insecticides (chlorantraniliprole and λ-cyhalothrin) may persist in food commodities which may be toxic to human health through dietary intake ( Kelageri et al., 2017 ; Solanki et al., 2019 ; Paramasivam, 2020 ; Sharma et al., 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contemporary finding on DT50 of spiromesifen is differing from the results reported with DT50 for brinjal 1.40-2.18 days (Vinothkumar et al, 2018) and other fruits and vegetables like, green chilli 2.18-2.40 days (Sharma et al, 2007), okra 1.65-1.68 days (Raj et al, 2012), tomato 0.93-1.38 days (Sharma et al, 2014) and cucumber 2.12-2.19 days (Banerjee and Agyani, 2019). This variation could be the effect of the major environmental factors and processes viz., relative humidity, temperature, wind, volatilization and photodegradation at field conditions (Sharma et al, 2014;Mate et al, 2015;Vinothkumar et al, 2018;Banerjee and Agyani, 2019;Solanki et al, 2019) which are not reliable in different geographical zones.…”
Section: Residue Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%