2006
DOI: 10.1080/03124070600833055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permanency Planning in Foster Care: A Research Review and Guidelines for Practitioners

Abstract: Permanency planning is a systematic, goal-directed and timely approach to case planning for children subject to child protection intervention aimed at promoting stability and continuity. The present paper reviews research into the area of permanency planning within the foster care system, with the aim of promoting research-informed policy and practice. Research published in both journals and books between 1998 and 2005 was reviewed. Exceptions to this were previously published seminal articles and texts that a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus cumulative incidences can be used to shed light on what type of problems OHC is a response to. Secondly, age is important as policy guidelines in several years have emphasised the importance of early intervention (Frame, 2002;Tilbury & Osmond, 2006). Cumulative incidence rates have been reported by other studies using Danish data and show a decreasing likelihood of entry into care (Fallesen, Emanuel, & Wilderman, n.d.;Ubbesen, Petersen, Mortensen, & Kristensen, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Thus cumulative incidences can be used to shed light on what type of problems OHC is a response to. Secondly, age is important as policy guidelines in several years have emphasised the importance of early intervention (Frame, 2002;Tilbury & Osmond, 2006). Cumulative incidence rates have been reported by other studies using Danish data and show a decreasing likelihood of entry into care (Fallesen, Emanuel, & Wilderman, n.d.;Ubbesen, Petersen, Mortensen, & Kristensen, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Thus, the bio-ecological perspective premises that child outcomes are influenced by multiple characteristics of the individual as well as family, social, cultural, and political factors that interact with the child and one another (Tilbury & Osmond, 2006). Children's attainment of permanency outcomes, then, will be influenced by the individual child, such as his or her developmental stage, as well as family relationships and cultural norms.…”
Section: Bio-ecological Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In child protection, the effect of worker's emotions on out-of-home placement decision has been associated with the impossibility to simultaneously respond to child, family and worker's own interests (Besharov, 1985;Goldstein et al, 1996;Taylor et al, 2008). Thus, for the one hand, it can be inferred that such emotions might result from worker's believes about the consequences that, based on his/her past experience, each social response (residential care vs. kept-at-home) will have for the child and the Tilbury & Osmond, 2006). On the other hand, it can also be assumed that such emotions can result from the risk of social and institutional criticism and recrimination toward the worker that might result from normative and social influence processes following an erroneous decision (either residential care placement or keep the child at home; e.g., Dickens, 2007;Kanani, Regehr, & Bernstein, 2002;Lachman & Bernard, 2006;Munro, 2005).…”
Section: Proposed Model: Psychosocial Decision-making Model Of Out-ofmentioning
confidence: 96%