2014
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4147-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peritoneal Surface Disease (PSD) from Appendiceal Cancer Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC): Overview of 481 Cases

Abstract: Background Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) used to treat peritoneal surface disease (PSD) from appendiceal cancer have shown variability in survival outcomes. The primary goal of this study was to determine predictors of surgical morbidity and overall survival. The secondary goal was to describe the impact of nodal status on survival after CRS/HIPEC for PSD from low-grade appendiceal (LGA) and high-grade appendiceal (HGA) primary lesions. Methods A retrospect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
46
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
46
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we did observe a lower rate of complete cytoreduction (35.5% versus 44.4%) than we have published in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal primaries other than goblet cell [14]. We attribute these deviations from our previously reported outcomes to the notoriously desmoplastic nature specific to goblet cell tumors, making surgical resection challenging.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, we did observe a lower rate of complete cytoreduction (35.5% versus 44.4%) than we have published in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal primaries other than goblet cell [14]. We attribute these deviations from our previously reported outcomes to the notoriously desmoplastic nature specific to goblet cell tumors, making surgical resection challenging.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Mahteme and Sugarbaker, on the other hand, did identify a significant difference in survival based on the completeness of cytoreduction score in patients receiving CRS and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (median OS 28.5 mo for CC0-1, 18.1 mo for CC2, and 5.9 for CC3, P = 0.007) [11,12]. In a larger cohort of patients with appendiceal carcinomatosis, our group identified completeness of cytoreduction as an independent prognosticator, and we believe that given increased power in the present study, we would have been able to identify a significant difference in survival based on completeness of cytoreduction [14]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Although the incidence has been increasing for over a decade, 1 several issues have made completing clinical trials difficult 20 . While prospective randomized trials have been attempted in the past (NCT00052962), none, at any stage, had completed planned accrual.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Appendiceal cancer has been the leading indication for cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC since its original description 22 . Peritoneal dissemination from appendiceal mucinous cancer has been treated with CRS/HIPEC for many years, with acceptable and decreasing morbidity and mortality 6,15,16,20 . As previously reported, surgical complications were associated with increased volume of disease, pre-existing medical comorbidities, poor functional status, and suboptimal nutrition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation