2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.11.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peritoneal metastases after laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for localized Wilms tumor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Technical aspects of the operative approach must never be reason for compromises concerning the correct way of performing WT surgery. A thorough analysis of the role of MIS in WT surgery is mandatory, especially since there are already reports on the combined use with NSS, which underline further possible problems [33]. MIS for WT surgery is a challenging procedure requiring exceptional expertise by the operating surgeon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technical aspects of the operative approach must never be reason for compromises concerning the correct way of performing WT surgery. A thorough analysis of the role of MIS in WT surgery is mandatory, especially since there are already reports on the combined use with NSS, which underline further possible problems [33]. MIS for WT surgery is a challenging procedure requiring exceptional expertise by the operating surgeon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peritoneal diffusion was described with peritoneal metastasis after laparoscopic NSS for WT. 9 However, in this report, the indication of NSS did not respect the usual protocols with MIS in a 10-cm upper pole tumor.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…8 The major drawback of NSS in children is inadequate experience and the conventional conclusion that a positive surgical margin is an independent risk factor for local recurrence in WT. 9,10 Although positive surgical margin is a major concern, developing experience of NSS on other conditions and in other age groups has shown NSS as a safe and reasonable choice in selected renal tumors in children. 7 NSS in the treatment of renal masses in children has gained acceptance lately and the vast majority of experience comes from WT studies.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumor spillage, which is a potential risk of MIS and NSS, upstages the tumor to stage 3, with the consequence of necessary postoperative radiotherapy. A recent study reported on peritoneal seeding and local recurrence after laparoscopic NSS for localized WT in a 2-year-old child [20]. However, in that report, tumor size was 10 cm (which is significantly large relative to a 2-year-old child kidney), lymph node sampling was not performed at the initial surgery, it is unknown if a retrieval bag was used for tumor extraction, and chemotherapy was only given 6 weeks after surgery (no neoadjuvant chemotherapy).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%