Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the OFT the cardiac jelly forms endocardial cushions, which are thickenings of the cardiac wall at opposite sides of the tube that generate an elliptical lumen cross-section. This might be an important role of the OFT cushions, since mathematical analyses have shown that an elliptical tube requires less energy for peristaltic pumping than a circular tube Taber and Perucchio (2000); Usha and Rao (1995). Studies have also suggested that the elliptical lumen cross-section is facilitated by molecules that tether the endocardium to the myocardium at specific locations, so that as the myocardium contracts, the cushions bulge out away from the tethering spots Garita et al (2011).…”
Section: The Developing Heart and Its Outflow Tractmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They acknowledged that biological peristaltic pumps are likely more complex than simple technical peristaltic pumps in an engineering sense (e.g. the roller pump, in which rotating rollers cause the periodic deformation required for pumping (Usha and Rao, 1995)), and that arguments presented by Forouhar et al (2006) in support of impedance pumping are valid only when the comparison of pumping mechanisms relies on observations in impedance pumps versus technical peristaltic pumps. To settle this controversy, it would be necessary to determine whether the tubular heart experiences active contraction throughout the myocardial layer (along the whole heart), as in a peristaltic pump, or if this contraction wave is triggered from a single compression site, as in the impedance pump.…”
Section: Mechanics Of Early Pumpingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) The cardiac jelly shows an uneven spatial distribution, which forces the open lumen of the heart tube to acquire an elliptic cross-section Mä nner et al, 2008). This finding might be interesting because mathematical analyses have shown that tubes of elliptic cross-section have a higher mechanical efficiency of peristaltic pumping compared with tubes of circular crosssection (Usha and Rao, 1995;Taber and Perruchio, 2000). (3) There is evidence that the cardiac jelly is a resilient component of the embryonic heart wall, which becomes deformed during systole and springs back to its original shape during diastolic relaxation and, thereby, might suck the blood into the inflow segment of the heart tube (Barry, 1948;Mä nner et al, 2009).…”
Section: Solid (Morphological) Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, it might be of interest that the formation of multiple endocardial spikes has been noted in stage-10/11 embryonic chick hearts subsequent to the injection of vascular endothelial growth factor into the cardiac jelly at initial stages of heart tube formation (Drake et al, 2006 Mathematical models have shown that the mechanical pumping efficiency of tubular peristaltic pumps depends on the cross-sectional shape of its wall. Tubular pumps of elliptic cross-section, for example, work at a higher mechanical efficiency compared with those of circular cross-section (Usha and Rao, 1995;Taber and Perrucchio, 2000). The initially elliptic cross-section of the endocardial lumen of the embryonic heart tube, thus, might be a structural base for the optimization of its pumping function .…”
Section: Which Processes Lead To the Establishment Of The Broad Area mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eccentric deformation of the endocardial tube is the consequence of an uneven distribution of cardiac jelly between the myocardium and endocardium. Its implications for the pumping function of the tubular heart seem to be two-fold : (1) It facilitates end-systolic occlusion of the endocardial lumen, and (2) there is evidence that heart tubes of elliptic cross-section might pump blood with a higher mechanical efficiency than those of circular cross-section (Usha and Rao, 1995;Taber and Perrucchio, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%