1986
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Perioperative blood transfusion and prognosis of resected stage Ia lung cancer
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
62
5
4
3
Citation Types
1
21
1
3
Year Published
Range
1987
19872021
2021Publication Types
Select...
64
5
Relationship
0
69
Authors
Journals
Cited by 69 publications
(26 citation statements)
References 12 publications
1
21
1
3
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This issue was discussed in previous reports and a dispute exists about the impact of perioperative blood transfusion on patient prognosis. [17][18][19] Our finding with regard to the nil effect of a previous malignancy on the outcome is in accordance with other studies. [20][21][22] The inclusion of frozen section and lung manipulation in our analysis mandates explanation.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This issue was discussed in previous reports and a dispute exists about the impact of perioperative blood transfusion on patient prognosis. [17][18][19] Our finding with regard to the nil effect of a previous malignancy on the outcome is in accordance with other studies. [20][21][22] The inclusion of frozen section and lung manipulation in our analysis mandates explanation.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The blood transfusion rate accompanying pulmonary resection varies in particular series from 36% to 55%. [8][9][10][11][12][13] In our series the frequency of transfusions (67%) was higher than in most studies including operable NSCLC. This outcome is due to several factors including mainly frequent preoperative blood donation, relatively high incidence of squamous cell carcinoma typically located centrally and necessitating more extensive resection, relatively high percentage of stage III disease, and routinely performed complete mediastinal lymph node dissection.…”
Section: Gts
contrasting
confidence: 66%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Overall 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were 9.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.8-10.6%) and 15% (95% CI 13.2-16.8%), respectively. Statistically significant differences in early mortality were observed when transfused patients were compared with nontransfused patients; 19 The incidence of infectious complications was 13.7% in transfused patients and 5.6% in nontransfused patients (p50.004). Blood transfusion was disclosed as the strongest predictor of those post-operative infectious complications (HR 3; 95% CI 1.5-6.2; p50.003).…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 95%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This issue was discussed in previous reports and a dispute exists about the impact of perioperative blood transfusion on patient prognosis. [17][18][19] Our finding with regard to the nil effect of a previous malignancy on the outcome is in accordance with other studies. [20][21][22] The inclusion of frozen section and lung manipulation in our analysis mandates explanation.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The blood transfusion rate accompanying pulmonary resection varies in particular series from 36% to 55%. [8][9][10][11][12][13] In our series the frequency of transfusions (67%) was higher than in most studies including operable NSCLC. This outcome is due to several factors including mainly frequent preoperative blood donation, relatively high incidence of squamous cell carcinoma typically located centrally and necessitating more extensive resection, relatively high percentage of stage III disease, and routinely performed complete mediastinal lymph node dissection.…”
Section: Gts
contrasting
confidence: 66%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Overall 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were 9.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.8-10.6%) and 15% (95% CI 13.2-16.8%), respectively. Statistically significant differences in early mortality were observed when transfused patients were compared with nontransfused patients; 19 The incidence of infectious complications was 13.7% in transfused patients and 5.6% in nontransfused patients (p50.004). Blood transfusion was disclosed as the strongest predictor of those post-operative infectious complications (HR 3; 95% CI 1.5-6.2; p50.003).…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 95%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This issue was discussed in previous reports and a dispute exists about the impact of perioperative blood transfusion on patient prognosis. [17][18][19] Our finding with regard to the nil effect of a previous malignancy on the outcome is in accordance with other studies. [20][21][22] The inclusion of frozen section and lung manipulation in our analysis mandates explanation.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The blood transfusion rate accompanying pulmonary resection varies in particular series from 36% to 55%. [8][9][10][11][12][13] In our series the frequency of transfusions (67%) was higher than in most studies including operable NSCLC. This outcome is due to several factors including mainly frequent preoperative blood donation, relatively high incidence of squamous cell carcinoma typically located centrally and necessitating more extensive resection, relatively high percentage of stage III disease, and routinely performed complete mediastinal lymph node dissection.…”
Section: Gts
contrasting
confidence: 66%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Overall 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were 9.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.8-10.6%) and 15% (95% CI 13.2-16.8%), respectively. Statistically significant differences in early mortality were observed when transfused patients were compared with nontransfused patients; 19 The incidence of infectious complications was 13.7% in transfused patients and 5.6% in nontransfused patients (p50.004). Blood transfusion was disclosed as the strongest predictor of those post-operative infectious complications (HR 3; 95% CI 1.5-6.2; p50.003).…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 95%