2008
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aen194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perioperative beta-blockade, 2008: What does POISE tell us, and was our earlier caution justified?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…25 Immediate preoperative beta blockade should therefore be used with caution. 26 The addition of a statin is probably justified in any patient with a high risk of myocardial injury. 27 In high-risk patients, acute hypotension is more dangerous than modest elevations in blood pressure.…”
Section: Perioperative Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Immediate preoperative beta blockade should therefore be used with caution. 26 The addition of a statin is probably justified in any patient with a high risk of myocardial injury. 27 In high-risk patients, acute hypotension is more dangerous than modest elevations in blood pressure.…”
Section: Perioperative Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Auch die Wahl eines spezifischen β RezeptorenBlockers könnte ursächlich für die zuvor beschriebenen unterschied lichen Langzeitergebnisse sein [44]. In den Arbeiten zum kardialen Risiko in der perioperativen Phase wurden u. a. Meto prolol, Atenolol, Bisoprolol und Esmolol verwendet.…”
Section: Therapienebenwirkungenunclassified
“…In all cases, beta blockade began immediately prior to surgery with orally administered sustained release metoprolol (succinate) that continued for 30 days. [5][6][7][8][9] The study's primary findings posed substantial challenges to each guidelines committee. In particular, the efficacy in reducing cardiac ischemic complications (primarily asymptomatic troponin release, but also the need for revascularization and new atrial fibrillation) was counterbalanced most convincingly by an increased rate of stroke (primarily disabling) and, to a less striking statistical degree, death (primarily from sepsis), with ''clinically significant'' hypotension a strong attributable risk factor in both.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%