1963
DOI: 10.3109/00016356309011240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periodontal Disease in Pregnancy I. Prevalence and Severity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

21
2,195
2
51

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5,915 publications
(2,402 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
21
2,195
2
51
Order By: Relevance
“…The total score of this index was calculated as the sum of the average individual debris and calculus scores. For the assessment of the qualitative changes in the gingival soft tissue, we employed the Gingival Index (GI) of Loe & Silness [35]. Six index teeth (44/32/36/24/12/16) and four areas for each tooth (mesial, distal, buccal and lingual) were considered to calculate GI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total score of this index was calculated as the sum of the average individual debris and calculus scores. For the assessment of the qualitative changes in the gingival soft tissue, we employed the Gingival Index (GI) of Loe & Silness [35]. Six index teeth (44/32/36/24/12/16) and four areas for each tooth (mesial, distal, buccal and lingual) were considered to calculate GI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of calculus (score 1) or the absence of calculus (score 0) was scored. To qualify the degree of peri‐implant inflammation, the modified Löe and Silness index (1963) was used. For bleeding, the bleeding index according to Mombelli et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Periodontal status of the tissue sampling areas in all subjects was determined by measuring the plaque index (PI) (Silness and Löe 1964), gingival index (GI) (Löe and Silness 1963), PD, and clinical attachment level (CAL). PD and CAL were measured on six sites of teeth.…”
Section: Study Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%