2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.06.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perindopril for the prevention of atrial fibrillation recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation: One-year experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar evidence has been reported in 256 AF patients to evaluate the effect of perindopril on RAF. In the subgroup of 128 patients treated with placebo, the recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation was 28.5% during the one-year follow-up [ 14 ]. However, another prespecified study from the CABANA Trial showed that 12.6% of ablation patients experienced symptomatic AF, and atrial tachycardia occurred in 36.4% of patients [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar evidence has been reported in 256 AF patients to evaluate the effect of perindopril on RAF. In the subgroup of 128 patients treated with placebo, the recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation was 28.5% during the one-year follow-up [ 14 ]. However, another prespecified study from the CABANA Trial showed that 12.6% of ablation patients experienced symptomatic AF, and atrial tachycardia occurred in 36.4% of patients [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, previous studies have yielded contradictory results. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Therefore, an unbiased meta-analysis is needed to establish the clinical role of RASIs. In this study we summarized the currently available evidence about the effect of RASI therapy for the prevention of AF recurrence after ablation, and we discuss the commonalities and differences among these trials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, seven articles were excluded, of which four did not have a blank control group, one did not have AF endpoint, one was a pretreatment trial, and one was a surgical ablation trial. Thus, 13 studies were eligible for inclusion in the analysis, of which 4 were RCTs [17][18][19][20] and the others were cohort studies. 21,22,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Of the 13 enrolled studies, the follow-up duration to detect AF recurrence after the catheter ablation ranged from 3 to 48 months.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In several randomized controlled trials (RCTs), RAS inhibitors were explored that positively reduced AF recurrences after catheter ablation. [17][18][19][20] In contrast, some observational studies suggested that RAS inhibitors did not appear to affect sinus rhythm maintenance following catheter ablation of AF. 21,22) Therefore, our meta-analysis is aimed at exploring the effect of RAS inhibitors on the recurrence of AF after catheter ablation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%