2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.04.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of sulfidogenic anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) treating acidic and zinc-containing wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
23
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2 and 3, respectively. The reactor started with 65% sulfate reduction and 80% COD removal without any lag period due to the fact that the reactor was fed with a lactate containing synthetic wastewater for more than 300 days in a previous study [11]. During the electron donor change from lactate to ethanol, high sulfate reduction and COD removal efficiencies were observed and hence the electron donor change did not adversely affect the system performance, similar to the study of Kaksonen et al [7].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…2 and 3, respectively. The reactor started with 65% sulfate reduction and 80% COD removal without any lag period due to the fact that the reactor was fed with a lactate containing synthetic wastewater for more than 300 days in a previous study [11]. During the electron donor change from lactate to ethanol, high sulfate reduction and COD removal efficiencies were observed and hence the electron donor change did not adversely affect the system performance, similar to the study of Kaksonen et al [7].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…1) previously fed with lactate and synthetic AMD for around 300 days [11] was used in the present study. Reactor was divided into four equal 5-L compartments by vertical baffles, each compartment having down-comer and riser regions created by further vertical baffle.…”
Section: Bioreactormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These reactors contain sulphate reducing bacteria (SRB) that have the ability to reduce sulphate to sulphide and then this sulphide reacts with certain metals dissolved, such as manganese, copper, iron and zinc, forming insoluble precipitates [1]. Numerous reactor designs for microbial sulphate reduction have been reported [4][5][6][7][8]. The applying of those reactor designs have also been reported to be used for the treatment of industrial effluents, particularly from acid mine drainage (AMD) [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%