2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of basic kinematic thresholds in the identification of crash and near-crash events within naturalistic driving data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Short-term driving events (e.g., braking, accelerating, and turning) constitute a major bulk of vehicle control. Naturalistic studies demonstrated that high frequency of intense driving events such as hard braking and sharp turning, in which a kinematic threshold (e.g., speed, acceleration) had been breached, is linked to the risk of crash involvement (e.g., Perez et al, 2017;Toledo, Musicant, & Lotan, 2008). The intensity of driving events was therefore adopted as a risk index in pay-as-you-drive insurance models (Tselentis, Yannis, & Vlahogianni, 2016) and driver training programs (Farah et al, 2014, Musicant & Lampel, 2010Musicant & Lotan, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Short-term driving events (e.g., braking, accelerating, and turning) constitute a major bulk of vehicle control. Naturalistic studies demonstrated that high frequency of intense driving events such as hard braking and sharp turning, in which a kinematic threshold (e.g., speed, acceleration) had been breached, is linked to the risk of crash involvement (e.g., Perez et al, 2017;Toledo, Musicant, & Lotan, 2008). The intensity of driving events was therefore adopted as a risk index in pay-as-you-drive insurance models (Tselentis, Yannis, & Vlahogianni, 2016) and driver training programs (Farah et al, 2014, Musicant & Lampel, 2010Musicant & Lotan, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible that the difference in magnitude seen in this study compared to others, like 100-Car, is because different triggers and kinematic thresholds were used. The kinematic thresholds typically use a combination of parameters related to vehicle speed, lateral acceleration, longitudinal acceleration, steering changes, and yaw rate changes (36). For example, the 100-Car study used a trigger threshold of ≥0.6 g for longitudinal acceleration whereas SHRP2 used ≥0.75 g so there were more candidate events found in 100-Car.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The developed model was successful in performing a risk assessment for vehicles as well as for roadway segments. SHRP2 NDS data were also used for crash and near-crash identification by establishing kinematic thresholds ( 38 ). Vehicle kinematics such as longitudinal deceleration and acceleration, freeway deceleration, lateral acceleration, swerve, yaw rate, and longitudinal and lateral jerk, among others, were thoroughly analyzed to determine threshold values at which crashes and near-crashes can be identified.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%