2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2015.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of two stage nanofiltration for treatment of textile effluent containing reactive dyes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The final reject from the last stage is finally sent to the solar evaporation pan for natural evaporation. The dried salt from the solar pond will be collected in HDPE bags and stored inside a shed [13][14][15][16][17][18] . …”
Section:  Ro Thirdstagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final reject from the last stage is finally sent to the solar evaporation pan for natural evaporation. The dried salt from the solar pond will be collected in HDPE bags and stored inside a shed [13][14][15][16][17][18] . …”
Section:  Ro Thirdstagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, NF is the most promising process since it exhibits a higher dye removal than UF . In addition, NF also has lower energy consumption and lower fouling tendency than RO . NF membranes not only have a high efficiency in removing dye color and turbidity but also eliminate chemical oxygen demand (COD) and conductivity, which makes the treated water reusable in textile industry processes .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Membrane technology, nanofiltration (NF) processes, in particular, has been widely used for the fraction and recovery of dyes and mixed salts in liquid solution. Nanofiltration with a molecular weight cut off (MWCO) from 200 to 1000 Da has advantages in the separation process including low osmotic pressure, high flux, strong rejection to compounds > 300 Da, and low retention of monovalent salts. , However, the commercial nanofiltration membranes still have the drawback of high rejection of Na 2 SO 4 which is a common salt present in dye product and wastewater. He et al applied nanofiltration DL membrane (from GE) with a negative surface for removal of Reactive Brilliant Blue KN-R and Na 2 SO 4 at 10 bar and pH 4.4, which retained both 97.5% Na 2 SO 4 and 99.99% dye in the feed .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%